- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
NINJA Question –
This is about passive loss deduction in individual taxation
Question:
Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane’s modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?
A.
$0
B.
$15,000
C.
$25,000
D.
$35,000
Answer: B is correct. Here is the explanation (which get me confused.)
Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly) of ordinary income with rental real estate activities. This exemption is reduced (but not below zero) by 50% of the amount by which the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the year exceeds $100,000.
First, the passive activities were netted $15,000 from the S corporation – $35,000 from the rental = $(20,000).
Second, the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000 (WHY?? DID THE QUESTION NOT SAY THE MODIFIED AGI IS $1,6500??).
Third, the amount of $140,000 that exceeds $100,000 is multiplied by 50%, equaling $20,000.
Fourth, the rental loss of $35,000 is decreased by the $20,000 limitation, leaving an allowable deduction of $15,000. (WHY IS IT TAKING 20K OUT OF THE 35K LOSS INSTEAD OF THE 25K DEDUCTION LIMITATION?? IS IT SUPPOSE TO BE 25K LIMITATION – 20K PHASEOUT = $5000 DEDUCTIBLE??)
Sorry for using capped letters, try to distinguish my words from the answer explanation.
Any help would be appreciated….thank you!!!
FAR - 76...PASSED (NOV 2013)
BEC - 86...PASSED (MAY 2014)
AUD - 85...PASSED (OCT 2014)
REG - 81...PASSED (NOV 2014)
Ethics - 100% DONE!!!Becker Final Review (book/lecture), NINJA Notes, Wiley Test Bank.
- The topic ‘REG Question from NINJA MCQ. I AM SUPER CONFUSED.’ is closed to new replies.