Non Monetary Exchanges discrepancy NINJA Vs. Roger CPA

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #172917

    Hi,

    I was wondering if someone could clarify this for me.

    The Roger book I’m using says in a non monetary exchange that LACKS commercial substance to use the lower of the FMV of Asset given up, FMV of asset received, or BV of asset given up (+/- Cash paid/received).

    In the same section for the NINJA notes, it just says to record the new asset at the BV of the asset given up.

    Any help is appreciated 🙂

    Created with Compare Ninja

    B-85 OCT 2012
    A-84 NOV 2012
    R-90 JAN 2013
    F-89 AUG 2012
    Ethics-92 (3rd try)

    I am DONE BABY!!!
    Used Roger 2012 + Wiley + NINJA Notes

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #358559
    jeff
    Keymaster

    The context of the NINJA Notes is strictly from a gain standpoint (which is why the commercial substance rule is in place).

    I could have included the different rules/scenarios, but for exam purposes – I wanted ONE thing to stick because I felt like it was more likely to be tested – that in a gain situation where the cash flows are not different and lack commercial substance – record the asset acquired at the book value of the asset given up.

    Sorry I wasn't more clear…the 3 bullet points on the topic are all from a gain perspective.

    -Jeff

    #358560

    Awesome, thanks Jeff!

    B-85 OCT 2012
    A-84 NOV 2012
    R-90 JAN 2013
    F-89 AUG 2012
    Ethics-92 (3rd try)

    I am DONE BABY!!!
    Used Roger 2012 + Wiley + NINJA Notes

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Non Monetary Exchanges discrepancy NINJA Vs. Roger CPA’ is closed to new replies.