Ninja vs Wiley Conflict

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183347
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    NINJA Question –

    This may be the 1 point that separates a 74 and 75 so I would appreciate if any of you guys can help me with this.

    Per Ninja Notes and Flashcard: Estate beneficiaries pay taxes on DNI — regardless if distributed or not. Whereas trust beneficiaries pay taxes on distributed income only.

    Per Wiley estate beneficiaries pay taxes only on distributed income (not DNI). A live answer-question forum I attended yesterday with a CPA host said that Wiley is correct (estate beneficiaries pay taxes only on distributed income not on DNI).

    Can someone please help me. This is DTax-0013 in Wiley and I have sent them an email (and Jeff too) but have not gotten any response.

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #508329
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I apologize – I have a bad habit of reading emails on my phone and then forgetting to come back to them later when I get to my computer and by then a mountain of emails have piled on top.

    In short, the NINJAs are correct.

    IRS Code Section 662:

    (a) Inclusion

    Subject to subsection (b), there shall be included in the gross income of a beneficiary to whom an amount specified in section 661 (a) is paid, credited, or required to be distributed (by an estate or trust described in section 661), the sum of the following amounts:

    (1) Amounts required to be distributed currently

    The amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently to such beneficiary, whether distributed or not.

    (emphasis added)

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/662

    #508386
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I apologize – I have a bad habit of reading emails on my phone and then forgetting to come back to them later when I get to my computer and by then a mountain of emails have piled on top.

    In short, the NINJAs are correct.

    IRS Code Section 662:

    (a) Inclusion

    Subject to subsection (b), there shall be included in the gross income of a beneficiary to whom an amount specified in section 661 (a) is paid, credited, or required to be distributed (by an estate or trust described in section 661), the sum of the following amounts:

    (1) Amounts required to be distributed currently

    The amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently to such beneficiary, whether distributed or not.

    (emphasis added)

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/662

    #508331
    impska
    Member

    Doesn't that code section indicate that it applies to BOTH estate and trust beneficiaries?

    If that's the case, then why do the flashcards and notes draw a distinction?

    Also, later in the code section, it says,

    “For purposes of this section, the phrase “the amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently” includes any amount required to be paid out of income or corpus to the extent such amount is paid out of income for such taxable year.”

    As usual, I feel like I need a translator when reading the IRC, but isn't that part saying that the beneficiary only includes it in gross income if it's paid?

    REG - 94
    BEC - 92
    FAR - 92
    AUD - 99

    #508388
    impska
    Member

    Doesn't that code section indicate that it applies to BOTH estate and trust beneficiaries?

    If that's the case, then why do the flashcards and notes draw a distinction?

    Also, later in the code section, it says,

    “For purposes of this section, the phrase “the amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently” includes any amount required to be paid out of income or corpus to the extent such amount is paid out of income for such taxable year.”

    As usual, I feel like I need a translator when reading the IRC, but isn't that part saying that the beneficiary only includes it in gross income if it's paid?

    REG - 94
    BEC - 92
    FAR - 92
    AUD - 99

    #508333
    jeff
    Keymaster

    impska, trust beneficiaries are taxed on their share of the trust's income distributed to them, but not more than their share of DNI of the trust.

    I hope that helps? If your materials read differently then please let me know and I would be glad to walk through it.

    #508389
    jeff
    Keymaster

    impska, trust beneficiaries are taxed on their share of the trust's income distributed to them, but not more than their share of DNI of the trust.

    I hope that helps? If your materials read differently then please let me know and I would be glad to walk through it.

    #508335
    impska
    Member

    I actually emailed my former Estate/Trust professor to get clarification and I'm all set.

    I think the confusion centers around the word “required” – if an Estate or Trust is not required to distribute all of DNI, then the beneficiary is taxed only on the distribution.

    In the case of Simple Trusts, beneficiaries pay tax on all of DNI, because simple trusts are required to distribute all of DNI. So for Simple trusts, the distribution should always equal DNI.

    Estates and Complex trusts aren't required to distribute all of DNI. So beneficiaries pay tax on the distribution.

    Makes sense to me!

    Although… it does almost sound like a third answer to this debate. I'm going with it though – He's a Doctor, after all. 😉

    REG - 94
    BEC - 92
    FAR - 92
    AUD - 99

    #508391
    impska
    Member

    I actually emailed my former Estate/Trust professor to get clarification and I'm all set.

    I think the confusion centers around the word “required” – if an Estate or Trust is not required to distribute all of DNI, then the beneficiary is taxed only on the distribution.

    In the case of Simple Trusts, beneficiaries pay tax on all of DNI, because simple trusts are required to distribute all of DNI. So for Simple trusts, the distribution should always equal DNI.

    Estates and Complex trusts aren't required to distribute all of DNI. So beneficiaries pay tax on the distribution.

    Makes sense to me!

    Although… it does almost sound like a third answer to this debate. I'm going with it though – He's a Doctor, after all. 😉

    REG - 94
    BEC - 92
    FAR - 92
    AUD - 99

    #508337
    thehip41
    Participant

    Good thread

    I think this: “I think the confusion centers around the word “required” – if an Estate or Trust is not required to distribute all of DNI, then the beneficiary is taxed only on the distribution.”

    I want to make sure you are understanding.

    They may received a distribution of 10,000,000, but only taxed to the extent of the DNI. So DNI is the max.

    So if it's less than their DNI – taxed on amount distributed

    If it's greater than their DNI – Taxed on DNI

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

    #508393
    thehip41
    Participant

    Good thread

    I think this: “I think the confusion centers around the word “required” – if an Estate or Trust is not required to distribute all of DNI, then the beneficiary is taxed only on the distribution.”

    I want to make sure you are understanding.

    They may received a distribution of 10,000,000, but only taxed to the extent of the DNI. So DNI is the max.

    So if it's less than their DNI – taxed on amount distributed

    If it's greater than their DNI – Taxed on DNI

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • The topic ‘Ninja vs Wiley Conflict’ is closed to new replies.