[TBone]

NINJA Question –

If some of these random and insanely vague or super detailed or strange rule questions come up on the REG exam then i don’t want to be a CPA.

F this shit

FAR: 66, 75
AUD: 67, 69, 70, 74, 74
REG: 71, 79
BEC: 73

[Anonymous]

I feel ya man… I yelled profanities at my screen loudly enough to make my neighbor's dogs bark lol. I thought BEC was annoying, but holy cow this one takes the cake.

[Anonymous]

I hear yah, currently reviewing REG and I have limited time to review. I will take it this wednesday and I feel like not prepared yet. I have one more chapter left and I need to go over and at least read one more time before my exam.

[jlee1086]

Not only are they vague, Ninja REG MCQ's drown you in a lot of distractors. I also found they went into a lot more detail than Becker than Wiley. I haven't got to BEC but I feel that Ninja REG has the most random information not in other courses. For those of you using Ninja as a supplement, do you notice this too?

FAR 57 (11/2014), 64 (1/2015), 79 (7/2015)
AUD 68 (2/2015), 79 (11/2015)
REG 79 (1/2016)
BEC 81 (4/2016)

[jeff]

Can you please post an example of such a question?

[jlee1086]

Any question on environmental law.

FAR 57 (11/2014), 64 (1/2015), 79 (7/2015)
AUD 68 (2/2015), 79 (11/2015)
REG 79 (1/2016)
BEC 81 (4/2016)

[jeff]

They're past AICPA questions…my thought is that it's better to see wacko questions before exam day than during it.

[jlee1086]

There was one sim in AUD where a Ninja question helped. I don't know how much detail I can get into without breaking those pesky non-disclosure rules but it was something where Ninja went deeper than Becker. In any other circumstance, I might have panicked. But the Ninja homework helped me realized the sim was actually not about that topic at all, it was just about how it affects risk.

I never got a question with a super wacko topic that was only on Ninja. But hey, it's always possible someone else did.

FAR 57 (11/2014), 64 (1/2015), 79 (7/2015)
AUD 68 (2/2015), 79 (11/2015)
REG 79 (1/2016)
BEC 81 (4/2016)

[Author]

Replies