[jeff]

NINJA Question –

With all of the marketing hype that was out there about being ready for the “new” exam and “buy our shiny new software…”, NINJA MCQ’s pass accuracy went UP in Q2/Q3 2017 (i.e. after the “change”).

Caveat: I didn’t verify anyone’e data, but I also don’t believe anyone would have an incentive to fib.

90.1% … I’ll take it.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qxfKqNvZWrKtQ-VfVsy49otykmubeSHOeX4lJlGxVtc/edit#gid=0

[Holly]

I believe it! I actually prefer the new format. I took two with old and two with new

BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16

[Lentilcounter]

Interesting data. I think the new format works for audit and my opinion is based on taking both the old and the new format. For FAR, I would like to see the DRS simulations improved so that the computer's screen maximum viewing capability is utilized. I understand that they are fixing this for 2018 but that's not soon enough for those of us, who are taking it in the next few months.

For those who thought they were going to pass based on Ninja MCQ scores and didn't, what do you think went wrong? What is it your first attempt at the exam?

BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?

[Earla Riopel (NYCARE)]

Recently passed AUD (2017 Q3). Used my 2016 Ninja notes as part of my reading/review. Hardly done any MCQs/SIMs, just reading 2016 Ninja notes/older Becker 2008 textbook.

I will definitely have a more concrete report about Ninja products by the end of 2017, especially score results. Taking 3 sections this 2017 Q4, using mostly Ninja products (FAR/BEC/REG Sniper packages).

[Author]

Replies