Ninja MCQ difficulty vs actual test

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #202199
    Yolonge
    Participant

    Here is my opinion on NINJA MCQ vs actual test

    FAR: Ninja > Actual

    AUD: Ninja < Actual

    REG: Ninja = Actual

    BEC: Ninja > Actual

    Anyone who studied with just or mostly with Ninja MCQ, any opinions?

    Materials: Wiley book + Ninja MCQ

    FAR - 83 (Jan 2016)
    Study time: 6 weeks
    BEC - 87 (April 2016)
    Study time: 2 weeks
    AUD - 92 (July 2016), (74 Feb 2016), (72 May 2016)
    Study time: 4 (Feb) + 2 (May) + 3 (July) = 9 weeks total
    REG - (70 April 2016)
    Study time: 3 weeks

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #777919
    itsj0nathan
    Participant

    Ive only taken BEC and AUD so I don't have an opinion on all four but Im going to have to agree with you on those two.

    BEC- 71, 7/02/16
    AUD- 67
    FAR- 08/27/16
    REG- 10/15/16

    #777920
    Bear-Bear
    Participant

    FAR ninja was much harder than the actual exam. For BEC, I felt the opposite.

    #777921
    Track55
    Participant

    AUD was the same.

    REG and BEC Ninja was harder.

    But I used Gleim too.

    AUD - 74, 99 !!
    REG - 74, 92
    BEC - 83
    FAR - 73, 86

    Studying for Ethics exam

    California candidate
    Business and Industry

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Ninja MCQ difficulty vs actual test’ is closed to new replies.