[HoldMyBeerCPA]

NINJA Question –

Hey all,

I’ve read similar horror stories about the BEC MCQs from Ninja. I’m about 1/3 of the way through the Ninja MCQs (trending score 77% and average score 78%, and dropping by the day), and am freaking out/discouraged by the difficulty of the MCQs. Of course, my review course didn’t even bother to consider covering some of the stuff in the MCQs (*ahem* Sovereign Wealth Funds *ahem*). In addition to that, a lot of the problems I’m coming across feel as if they take 3 minutes to solve due to the complexity of it. With that said, my confidence going into the exam is plummeting as I don’t know what to do other than keep pushing through and not rage quitting on this one.

On the other hand, the current Roger MCQ test bank has been much less turbulent. I’ve done about 170 so far and have missed only 20.

I only have 8 days left, and will continue to fight on, but I’m wondering if the actual test is similar, in terms of nature and scope of the MCQs, to the NINJA MCQs or the Roger MCQs.

The insight of recent test takers would be much appreciated.

-Turbo

[mtaylo24]

@Turbo, Ninja definitely was rough for BEC, but it gets better as the questions repeat. I think it has FV measurement in it, a FAR subject, which I never came across in the actual thing. It did save my ass on a EVA question I had last window, and could have save my ass with a manual present value (without the figures presented) question the window before. Keep grinding though, on the actual expect IT/COSO questions from another planet regardless, every other topics should be straight forward.

AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)

[Author]

Replies