[Tcohle]

NINJA Question –

While CPAExcel is great because it divides material into bite-sized lectures, sometimes I feel like “Gosh I just want to get through all the material so I can start going full throttle on MCQ!

On the first trip through the program I may not 100% understand something, but I don’t want to “spin my wheels” on it, I just feel like getting through all of the program so I can start the MCQ phase. Is that not a good strategy?

FAR- 5/11/15 76!!
AUD-10/31/15 63, 84!
REG-7/12/16 72
BEC-8/31/15 75!! Perfect Score!

Wiley CPAExcel Platinum
Ninja 10 pt combo for FAR/AUD/BEC

[Last Chance CPA]

I think that's what most of us do. CPAExcel has really bad video lectures, but their study text is great. The study text is less comprehensive than the books, so probably a better choice. I only read the books for FAR, and most of AUD, but for REG and BEC, I pretty much went right into the MCQs. Ninja MCQ is a great way to learn if you utilize the reference material…

FAR - 76
AUD - 75
BEC - 75
REG - 76

Now I need some experience!!! And some networking...

[Anonymous]

I only ever read the book or watched lectures for BEC and felt woefully unprepared going into it since I only had two days of MCQ cramming prior to that exam (and with the WTB rather than NINJA MCQs since they weren't yet around then). For REG, AUD, and FAR, I used the NINJA Notes to get through the core concepts of the material quickly and then just focused on the NINJA MCQs after that. Worked for me!

[golfball7773]

^that sounds like a great idea! With ADHD, I tend to want to not focus when the videos are learning, so I tend to not only waste time but not learn anything. I learn best trying to solve a problem (lets not get into the “just listen and try not to solve when my wife is speaking”)

Link: Current CPAexcel Discount Codes

FAR: 63, 55, 62
REG: 65, 77*
AUD: Fail, 64, 71
BEC: 72, 74, 81

*expired

[Author]

Replies