Confused by the answer to a question

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #187434
    lsutigers03
    Participant

    NINJA Question –

    A company is considering outsourcing one of the component parts for its product. The company currently makes 10,000 parts per month. Current costs are as follows:

    Per Unit Total



    Direct materials $4 $40,000

    Direct labor 3 30,000

    Fixed plant facility cost 2 20,000

    The company decides to purchase the part for $8 per unit from another supplier and rents its idle capacity for $5,000/month. How will the company’s monthly income before taxes change?

    A. Decrease $15,000

    B. Decrease $10,000

    C. Increase $5,000

    D. Increase $10,000

    I though the answer would be Decrease $5,000 ($10,000 increase in costs and $5,000 income from renting the idle space)

    Here is the answer. I feel stupid because I don’t understand why the answer is C.

    The product should be produced if the incremental cost to produce the product, including any opportunity cost of idle facilities, is less than the purchase price.

    Since the fixed plant charge will not change due to this decision, it is irrelevant and should not be considered. The direct materials and direct labor costs ($40,000 + $30,000 = $70,000) are relevant costs. These incremental costs total $70,000 per month to make the product, while they can buy the part for $80,000 per month, an increase in monthly costs of $10,000.

    However, the rental income from renting the idle capacity of $5,000 reduces the monthly cost of purchasing the parts, for a net increase in monthly income before taxes of $5,000.

    REG - 78
    BEC - 74, 67, 69, 69, 70, 79
    FAR - 76
    AUD - 69, 69, 69, 74, 85

    Licensed Louisiana CPA

    “You never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #584148
    M.O.D.
    Member

    You are right, the answer is wrong.

    “These incremental costs total $70,000 per month to make the product, while they can buy the part for $80,000 per month, an increase in monthly costs of $10,000.”

    So far so good.

    “However, the rental income from renting the idle capacity of $5,000 reduces the monthly cost of purchasing the parts,”

    So far so good.

    “for a net increase in monthly income before taxes of $5,000.”

    Should be for a DECREASE … of $5000.

    BA Mathematics, UC Berkeley
    Certificates in CPA and EA preparation, College of San Mateo
    CMA I 420, II 470
    FAR 91, AUD Feb 2015 (Gleim self-study)

    #584149
    lsutigers03
    Participant

    Ok thanks for the reply.

    REG - 78
    BEC - 74, 67, 69, 69, 70, 79
    FAR - 76
    AUD - 69, 69, 69, 74, 85

    Licensed Louisiana CPA

    “You never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Confused by the answer to a question’ is closed to new replies.