Are NINJA MCQs harder than the actual exam?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • February 25, 2016 at 11:46 pm #200372
    DZagt
    Participant

    NINJA Question –

    Havent taken a part yet and using NINJA MCQ as my review (coming from Gleim)..It seems to be easier than Gleim, but I am on the assessment phase…

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • February 26, 2016 at 12:43 am #759632
    Biff-1955-Tannen
    Participant

    I would say yes. I've only taken AUD and BEC so far, but in my opinion the MCQ are a lot more in depth and detailed than exam questions. Much more involved with calculations etc. But I think that is a good thing, because it will get you used to manipulating numbers in different ways, rather just just a straight forward approach.

    AUD 93 Jan 16
    BEC 83 Feb 16
    FAR 83 Apr 16
    REG 84 May 16

    99% Ninja MCQ only

    February 26, 2016 at 12:48 am #759633
    DZagt
    Participant

    Did you use just NINJA biff?

    February 26, 2016 at 12:49 am #759634
    CM
    Participant

    Yes, NINJA MCQs are harder.

    FAR: 78 (5x)
    AUD: 80 (3x)
    BEC: 9/07/2016
    REG: 12/06/2016

    Failure is never an option.

    "Faith in your own powers and confidence in your individual methods are essential to success." Roderick Stevens

    February 26, 2016 at 12:56 am #759635
    Biff-1955-Tannen
    Participant

    I used Ninja MCQ for both AUD and BEC. Wouldn't have passed without it.

    AUD 93 Jan 16
    BEC 83 Feb 16
    FAR 83 Apr 16
    REG 84 May 16

    99% Ninja MCQ only

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Are NINJA MCQs harder than the actual exam?’ is closed to new replies.