[Anonymous]

For those of you who have used both before… does the MCQs and SIMs in Becker and Ninja overlap each other (same questions. etc)? If so, by how much? I am currently using Becker and I am thinking about supplementing Ninja to get more MCQs and SIMs practice.

I am sorry If this topic was already discussed somewhere else. If so, could you direct me there?

Thanks!

[Tripin93]

Yes, they do overlap. I've used Becker for all sections, and also Ninja MC for AUD and BEC. For 5-10% of the Ninja questions, I've already seen them in Becker.

Motivated by JC. I do it to make God proud.

FAR: 91 July 2015
AUD: 83 October 2015
REG: 81 January 2016
BEC: 83 February 2016

[CPA2BEE]

I've used Becker for all of my exams and NINJA MCQs for my AUD retake and for BEC. I will for sure be using both products for REG as well. I saw a good amount of overlap between the two, but I think this combo works because I am 2-for-2 when combining Becker and NINJA. I highly recommend this route.

FAR - 80
AUD - 82
BEC - 80
REG - 85

ETHICS - 90
EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016

[Anonymous]

Sweet! Thanks guys!

[Anonymous]

Since it looks like you might be restudying for BEC I'll add this:

I saw the least amount of overlap on BEC between Becker and NINJA. Becker was great for targeted studying on weak areas while NINJA was great for an overall, comprehensive, review.

[Tripin93]

I agree with Angelwatch. When I took BEC, I rushed and crammed most of the studying at the end. For my “final review,” did Ninja, and Ninja told me which areas I was weak in. For my weak areas, I went to Becker.

Before the “final review,” I only did Becker. The day before my exam, I purchased Ninja, because I was panicking. I panicked, because I didn't cover all of Becker and I read on this forum that people who used Becker felt unprepared. I'm glad that I bought Ninja.

Motivated by JC. I do it to make God proud.

FAR: 91 July 2015
AUD: 83 October 2015
REG: 81 January 2016
BEC: 83 February 2016

[Author]

Replies