Possible Becker MC error

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #167065
    thebusyone
    Member

    I think this question in the Becker FAR material is wrong, but what do you all think?

    _________________________________________________________________________

    Under U.S. GAAP, a material loss should be presented separately as a component of income from continuing operations when it is:

    a. An extraordinary item.

    b. A cumulative effect type change in accounting principle.

    c. Unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence.

    d. Not unusual in nature but infrequent in occurrence.

    _________________________________________________________________________

    They say the correct answer is d. I have no idea why.

    ______________________
    BEC - 4/4/11 - 83
    REG - 1/4/12 - 82
    AUD - 2/18/12 - 77
    FAR - 5/31/12 ? 88
    Ethics - 6/13/12 - 95

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #328576
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It is correct. It says it is a separate component of CONTINUING OPERATIONS. Extraordinary items (a) are not from continuing operations, and also (c) is the definition for extraordinary items. A cumulative effect type change for accounting principle (b) is corrected through beginning retained earnings. Since (d) is NOT unusual in nature but infrequent it is from continuing operations. For it to be extraordinary is needs to meet both criteria of unusual AND infrequent. It would be the same as when you list depreciation or interest expense separately under continuing operations.

    #328577
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yea this stumped me at first too…but then I went back and looked at the book and realized I circled the “or” between Unusual or Infrequent on the Income statement line item under Income from continuing operations.

    #328578
    thebusyone
    Member

    Thanks fellas!

    ______________________
    BEC - 4/4/11 - 83
    REG - 1/4/12 - 82
    AUD - 2/18/12 - 77
    FAR - 5/31/12 ? 88
    Ethics - 6/13/12 - 95

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Possible Becker MC error’ is closed to new replies.