Pensions- Problem with Becker question

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #164732
    Sherrid
    Member

    Becker Chapter F6 Pensions question 5 of 19.

    If the PBO is more than the FV of the plan assets amortization of the net transition asset will increase the

    pension expense but in this question Becker subtracts the amount instead of increasing the expense it’s

    decreased? I used SIRAGE and came up with an expense of $211,000 but Becker’s answer is $205,000.

    I’m confused and need to know if I’m wrong in understanding this concept. Please help.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #319416
    Sherrid
    Member

    Back again. I just reread Becker's explaination which notes that amortization of a net transistion asset will decrease the pension expense (this makes sense) but I want to know how they can have an asset when their PBO is more than the FV of the plans assets- ? Please help.

    #319417
    nuclear3579
    Member

    Sherrid,

    You have a pension plan asset only if the Fair Value is greater than the PBO. It means the plan is worth more than the obligation, it's overfunded. You'll have a pension plan liability if the PBO is greater than the FV, meaning the obligation is more than what it's worth. That's an underfunded plan. Page F6-12 explains it in more detail.

    Hope this helps,

    BEC - 84
    FAR - 71, 80
    REG - 82
    AUD - 78 - Passed! Done!

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Pensions- Problem with Becker question’ is closed to new replies.