Net periodic pension cost-Becker

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Anonymous.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1707156
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So according to the updated study materials the Service Cost portion of the net periodic pension cost is now recorded to compensation. Then how come it’s still added up in total net periodic pension cost in the SIMS? I am confused…I distinctly remember an MCQ in Ninja where the service cost was excluded…

    “becker-cpa-review”

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1715845
    Jott
    Participant

    ninja retirement benefits question#1417 excludes service cost from “net periodic pension cost”
    ninja retirement benefits question#558 includes service cost in “net periodic pension cost”

    i am really confused

    #1716068
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The way I go about this is that if I see “total net periodic pension cost” then it includes service cost, but if it's just “net periodic pension cost” then it excludes service cost.

    Service cost should be reported as compensation cost…

    #1716091
    Jott
    Participant

    except that question 558 never says “total” or anything different and still includes service cost

    558: On January 2, 20X1, East Corp. adopted a defined benefit pension plan. The plan's service cost of $150,000 was fully funded at the end of 20X1. Prior service cost was funded by a contribution of $60,000 in 20X1. Amortization of prior service cost was $24,000 for 20X1. Assuming that no amortization of unrecognized gain or loss is required in 20X1, what amount should East recognize as net periodic pension cost in 20X1?

    answer: East Corp.'s net periodic pension cost for 20X1 is $174,000, as shown below:

    Service cost $150,000
    Interest cost 0
    Amortization of past service cost 24,000
    Expected return on plan assets 0
    Amortization of unrecognized gain/loss 0
    $174,000
    ========
    The interest cost is computed by applying the appropriate rate times the projected benefit obligation (PBO) at January 1, 20X1. Since this is the first year of the plan, the PBO at January 1, 20X1, is $0, which means that the interest cost for 20X1 is $0. The expected return on the plan assets is computed by applying the appropriate rate times the fair value of the plan assets (PA) at January 1, 20X1. Since this is the first year of the plan, the PA at January 1, 20X1, is $0, which means that the expected return on plan assets for 20X1 is $0. Since no amortization of unrecognized gain/loss is necessary (which is stated in the facts), the net periodic pension cost consists of the service cost and the amortization of past service costs.

    #1716094
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @jot@Stetson.edu yes – I have seen that question on Ninja MCQs too, but on Becker, they make a clear distinction, so I'm not sure.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Net periodic pension cost-Becker’ is closed to new replies.