[Anonymous]

Hi all, so I will share with you my results (even though they are not good). I was hoping someone could help me interpret them. The M/C is pretty straight forward, it’s more with the simulations

M/C 1 – 60%

M/C 2 – 73%

M/C 3 – 50%

Simulations:

“Risk” – 6/10

“Tickmarks” – 1/5

“Statistical Sampling” – 7/10

“Comparative Financial Statements” – 11/16

“Government Auditing” – 3/5

“Research” – 1/1

So do they really weight it like Becker does (meaning I got a 56% on Simulations) or would the testing center do it differently? Thanks!

[mattcpafromva]

Hey don't put too much stock into the Becker Final Reviews. In Audit I got a 75/80 on practice and got a 92! On BEC I got a 73 on practice and got a 90. In terms of how they weight SIMS no one really knows, but I'd assume they weight it by question, not by how many parts are in a question (i.e. 4/8 +3/4 = 7/12 wouldn't be how I would guess they would do it. It would be (.5 + .75) /2)) Hope that helps!

BEC- 4/3- 90
AUD- 4/24- 92
REG- 5/31- 88
FAR- 7/27- 94

[Anonymous]

@mattcpafromva I hope that it works out the same for me – thanks!

[Author]

Replies