- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Becker Question –
Quo manufactures heavy equipment to customer specifications on a contract basis. On the basis that it is preferable, accounting for these long-term contracts was switched from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method:
A. Change in accounting principal
B. Change in accounting estimate
C. Correction of an error in previously presented f/s
D. None of the above.
Answer: A
Next question is same, but asks whether it’s
A. Cumulative effect approach,
B. Retroactive or retrospective restmt approach,
C. Prospective approach.
Answer B.
I thought the answer would be B, change in accounting estimate. Isn’t this one of those changes in accounting principle that are inseparable from a change in estimate? Change to LIFO or change in depreciation method are change in principle, but are treated as change in accounting estimate, and are classified as prospectively.
Also, aren’t retrospectively approach require cumulative effect…as in beg. RE is changed.
Help??
Thanks:!)
- The topic ‘FAR question from Becker (F1)’ is closed to new replies.