Becker vs. NINJA

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #202568
    samantha
    Participant

    I am using Becker as my review course but I also bought NINJA MCQ as supplement for my REG test.

    I am noticing that MCQ from NINJA are coming up that have topics/information never covered in my Becker material… are these things relevant in my studying? Or should I only focus on what was mentioned in Becker.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #780278
    drichter321
    Participant

    I found my self better prepared for my Reg exam using Wiley and Ninja. I am not sure how I passed BEC with becker, but there were a lot of questions not covered in becker MCQ that I saw on the exam.

    Ninja and Wiley seem to have the best test banks.

    BEC: 75 lost credit, could not pass far 🙁
    AUD: 76 lost credit could not pass far 🙁
    FAR: 74, FML. Next exam 06/14/23
    REG: 75 lost credit could not pass far 🙁

    #780279
    Vanessachy
    Participant

    I feel like IT part in Becker isn't complete, when I was working on Ninja questions, I was struggling, I think Ninja is better

    Far 10/26/2015, 64, 1/4/2016, 82
    Reg 7/10/2015, 60, 2/27/2016, 86
    Aud, 5/9/2016, 74 (ouch), 7/26/2016, I cannot wait to take this test again
    Bec, 6/10/2016, 70,9/8 retake

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Becker vs. NINJA’ is closed to new replies.