[south0085]

How much different are the actual exam questions in comparison to the Becker questions? Are they near identical with only the names of companies and people changed? Or are they totally different questions that ask you about the same stuff? My concern is that I am not learning the concepts very well. I can (on the first two chapters so far), answer every single multiple choice question correctly (minus a few). But I’m afraid I might get to the exam and not recognize the question at all. Any help? Thank you kindly.

[Anonymous]

I think it varies depending on the exam and sometimes even the sections within the exams. For example, I felt like Becker gave an accurate picture of what AUD would be from an all around standpoint. For BEC, I felt like most of the sections were easier on the actual exam than Becker, but I felt the IT was tougher. I found FAR to be easier on the actual exam, and I found REG to be easier in certain areas (for example, calculations) but more difficult in others (theory based questions). I hope that isn't disclosing too much!

[Anonymous]

I studied for FAR and BEC using only Beckers self study and the passmaster questions/supplemental and have felt that the actaul exam questions were i guess …good. some were very easy and some were more challenging, but never really to the extent that the difficulty can get on a few of the becker questions. like if you study the mc questions from becker you wont be surprised by anything on the exam. If you make sure to go thru all the passmaster questions and redo those you missed and learn why you missed them you should be fine on the test..many of the questions follow the same format and i even saw some that were exactly the same.

[Author]

Replies