[goodluck2everyone]

Seriously I’m boycotting Becker for life

BEC- 80
REG- 68, 71, July
AUD- 61 , 84
FAR- -- 75 🙂

[Minimorty]

WOW. You are blaming the entire Becker review course and ALL you had was a .pdf of the books? Were they even current books? Your position is absolutely embarrassing. I just dont see how you can convince yourself that Becker is garbage when you didnt even go through the course. This type of misinformation is why I stand up and call B.S. on people like you.

[goodluck2everyone]

whether or not I had the whole review course is irrelevant towards my position

the books and practice questions alone should be enough for me to pass. An instructor droning on and reading the book verbatim has no baring on me understanding the material. You might have difficulty reading and understanding, you need someone to spell it out for you but I'm not like that. The books are all I need.

BEC- 80
REG- 68, 71, July
AUD- 61 , 84
FAR- -- 75 🙂

[Witchkizzle]

wow. really sad i missed this the first time around.

Texas CPA
Licensed 03/12

[Minimorty]

lol. I enjoyed reading this again. Too fricken funny.

[Witchkizzle]

I'm going to be honest. At first, in that other thread LOL@REGsims, I thought you were being extraordinarily harsh on @goodluck.

Let me just say this: It all makes sense now.

Do the books alone come with the MCQ questions if you don't purchase the whole course? <—- serious question

He was saying he did 2,000 MCQ's but only had PDF's of the book.

Texas CPA
Licensed 03/12

[Minimorty]

I'm not sure. If you purchase 2nd hand, I'm sure you can buy any combination. Does Becker sell just the books? Not sure. All I know is that you need the books, lectures, MCQ, and SIMS at a minimum to say you've “used” Becker.

[Anonymous]

Hahahaha! A timeless classic!

[Witchkizzle]

I liked Becker. I did not like Tim though. Even my wife didn't like Tim. We were both very excited to see Peter when he would do the lecture.

I loved it when he chugged that can of red bull.

I also loved it when he said “if your gf/bf doesn't support you in this process then leave them. Chances are, once you pass you are going to be making so much money you are going to upgrade anyway”

It was all I used because that was what my firm paid for.

Texas CPA
Licensed 03/12

[KasiaS]

See @Witchkizzle? There is a method to Mini's madness!!

This is by far one of my favorite and most entertaining threads on this fine forum. I'm just sad that I didn't catch on to the fun until after the thread was initially closed!

FAR 88 (07/15/11)
BEC 83 (08/31/11)
AUD 81 (10/15/11)
REG 83 (11/26/11)

Used NIU Correspondence CPA Review

[mla1169]

Yeah, this thread was interesting and had plenty of unexpected twists and turns.

FAR- 77
AUD -49, 71, 84
REG -56,75!
BEC -75

Massachusetts CPA (non reporting) since 3/12.

[Anonymous]

There are eight typographical and grammatical errors in one post on this page. Can anyone else spot them?

[jenuno01]

“what makes you think I had whole review course? I only had the becker books in pdf form

wrong again morty “

@Kricket… I counted 8 on this one. Did I win?

Class of 2012

[Anonymous]

No. Try again.

[Minimorty]

Probably mine if you are counting CAPS and lacking apostrophes. When did you become the grammar nazi, Kricket? 😉

[Anonymous]

No. It's not one of yours @mini. Try again. I find that your posts are usually grammatically correct. I have always been the grammar nazi. I just don't let it out to play very often. This thread brought it out in me. If someone is going to argue on a public forum then their argument will carry much more weight if it is grammatically correct and well thought out. Typographical errors and poor grammar just take away from the strength of their argument. That is just my opinion.

[Author]

Replies