- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Folks, I sent the following message to Becker. Hoping for a reply soon. If you are a Becker user did you notice the problem. Maybe you can help me identify what I missed? If so, thanks. The fact pattern are the same; only different numbers plugged in. None of them were in Becker’s updates. Here is the msg I sent to Becker:
The fact pattern in CPA-04092 and CPA-04082 are practically the same. They both provide the old credit policy and the new/current credit policy; the average collection period for both credit policies; the variable cost ratio; and the required rate of return; using 360 days. Also, both questions required no tax implications and asked for the carrying cost of the additional investments in receivables. However, the solutions were calculated differently. CPA-04092 did not include the average collection period in its calculations whereas CPA-04082 did. There is no difference in the fact pattern for these two questions. The only difference is the format of the questions and the numerical values provided. Please provide me with the correct solutions and explanations to the problems.
F - Passed...THANK YOU, LORD. GLORY TO GOD.
B - Passed...THANK YOU, LORD. GLORY TO GOD.
A - Passed...THANK YOU, LORD. GLORY TO GOD.
R - Passed...THANK YOU, LORD. GLORY TO GOD.Ethics - 95
Licensed CPA
I COULD NOT HAVE DONE THIS WITHOUT MY LORD. THANK YOU.
"According to your faith will it be done to you." Matthew 9:29
- The topic ‘Becker BEC: Inconsistent solutions to similar fact patterns’ is closed to new replies.