- This topic has 24 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I had a family friend ask my advice on the order she should take her exams. I realized that I did it differently than what I would recommend? How about you?
I did: BEC, AUD, REG, FAR
Having REG and FAR back to back was my biggest regret. I felt like I forced myself to forget the financial rules that had been reinforced by AUD in order to retain the REG rules. I then had to turn around and redo what I had just undone.
I should have: FAR, AUD, BEC, REG.
I now suggest starting with FAR since it has the most material and study motivation tends to be highest at the beginning of the process. It’s a nice bonus to have a good understanding of FAR going into AUD. BEC is a nice breather (amount of material to cover-wise, not actually difficulty-wise). Plus, I think it is good to put as much space between FAR and REG as possible. BEC gives you the opportunity to stop focusing on and reinforcing the financial concepts that you will have to purge from your brain in order to remember the tax rules for REG.
AUD-April 2012-CPAExcel only-86
BEC-April 2012-CPAExcel w/ additional practice questions from Becker-91
REG-May 2012-Becker primarily w/ practice questions from CPAExcel-78
FAR-July 2012-CPAExcel primarily w/ Becker supplements-81
- The topic ‘What order did you take the exams? What would you change if you did it over?’ is closed to new replies.
