- This topic has 12 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I had a thought that wanted to see what the consensus is here regarding my strategy of maximizing the 18 month window.
I’ll preface by saying I work full time and have a family with little ones at home so taking more than one section per window is most likely out of the question (or moreso preparing for more than one section)
That said – I don’t feel good about my first section (FAR) I just took. My original strategy was if I fail to take again next while the info is still fresh. BUT…in thinking a little further maybe it would be better use of the 18 months to take at the end instead? The thought being it wouldn’t take as long to prepare as I wouldn’t be doing it from “scratch” like I did these past few months. Sure, I would forget a lot of it but I’d think it would come back to me a lot faster as well and wouldn’t have to do the grueling process all over again but just refresh and really focus on weak areas.
With that I would have 2 of the “grueling” prep processes out of the way before the clock starts ticking (FAR and the next section would take to start the clock). I say this as I’ve really got to maximize the amount of time as with one test per quarter I can only afford so many failures…
Thoughts? Seem like a wise strategy, or would the general advice be to stick with FAR as it’s really fresh in my head? I feel like I’m close on FAR and know the material…just need to focus on a couple of areas and JE’s/SIM’s…
FAR - 87 (5/15)
AUD - 93 (8/15)
REG - 86 (2/16)
BEC - 87 (5/16)
- The topic ‘Thinking about strategy change to maximize 18 months?’ is closed to new replies.