@CPA_RAJ The requirements for the CPA experience requirement vary from state-to-state, but the only one which doesn't require any experience (to my knowledge) is Massachusetts which has a non-reporting license; however, it requires a Master's: https://www.mass.gov/ocabr/licensee/dpl-boards/pa/faqs.html#c02 I don't know what further requirements there are on the Master's to know if your current Master's would count or not – you could contact the Mass Board to clarify. If your current Master's would count, then all you'd need to do to get licensed in Mass would be to verify that you meet their educational requirements and to pass the exams.
All other states require a year of experience. For the other states, specific requirements vary, but all require it to be in accounting (some define accounting more loosely than others) and require it to be signed off on by either a supervisor or a CPA (who is active at the time of signing and the time of the experience) or a CPA who is a supervisor – again, which version of requirement varies by state. Some require the experience to be obtained after you have completed the education requirements, others allow the experience to be completed at any time. So, if you applied to one of the states that requires the experience to be in accounting and be signed off on by a supervisor, but didn't require the supervisor to be a US CPA and didn't require that the experience be within the last 10 years, then experience from 15 years ago in India could fulfill that requirement if you were still in touch with one of your supervisors from India (I saw a discussion recently about Virgina that may indicate Virginia would be one such country, but I'm not 100% sure).
Bottom line is, I think there may be options for you for the CPA designation, but it's definitely worth digging into the options before taking the exams to make sure it wouldn't require a job change or an additional Master's in order to get licensed. As long as you're not doing public accounting (taxes or auditing), you can be licensed in a state different from where you work and still put “CPA” on your resume or on your business cards for your IT work etc.
The CMA is another option, but when I looked into it, it was going to be more expensive to maintain (renewal costs were higher than my state's CPA renewal fees, and I think it require more CPE, too), and the CMA isn't nearly as well-known as the CPA. The CMA may be more well-known internationally, but definitely not more well-known in the USA. Any time someone has to look up your credential, it's not as worth-while, and that's the main benefit of the CPA – people won't have to look it up to know what it is when you apply. So, if you won't be able to qualify for the CPA without getting an accounting job and without getting an additional Master's, but if you would qualify for the CMA, then the CMA might be worth considering, but if you would qualify for either then I think the CPA is more valuable. I originally planned to get the CMA before the CPA, and then planned to get both, but have now decided that since I've met the requirements for the CPA, it's really more valuable for me than the CMA.
Edited to add: This was the discussion about Virginia: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/who-can-sign-off-the-experience-verification-form-for-va I looked up their experience forms the day I saw this thread, and it doesn't require a CPA sign off. The form doesn't specifically discuss the international aspect that I recall, and none of the posters in the thread were internationals, but since I'd looked at the thread before, a Virginia CPA had posted confirming that s/he had been licensed with sign-off by a non-CPA supervisor, so VA truly does not require a CPA sign-off.