@anyatver
@cpamang mentioned that the report is not issued anymore if you failed. So, a bit confused. Either way though, I don't think those reports are necessarily helpful, or even meant to be.
The whole presentation of the subcategories along with ‘stronger, weaker, comparable' is kind of like saying “Here's how you performed in relation to others who just barely passed.”
Then they follow it up with “When you prepare for your re-take, you should not ignore any areas that you did comparably or stronger in, as they will be tested again next time”, or whatever.
If you fail a section, you had better plan on studying everything all over again from square 1. What you might feel stronger in, you may not be after all. The exams have ways of unearthing even the slightest weaknesses of a test taker!
On a different note, slightly, does anyone know if they changed the NPO/Government coverage percents on FAR? It used to be 18-24 percent. I thought I read that it went down to 10-15?
Of course, this doesn't have a lot of meaning, as there are people who posted on here and reported that half their FAR test felt like nonprofit/government. I did well on those areas when I took FAR a year ago. Probably why I got in the 60 percents instead of the 50's.
.