- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
For the sake of confidentiality, I am not going to share what jurisdiction I got this information from, but assuredly, this is straight from the horse’s mouth.
I’m in a bit of a predicament. I graduated a few years ago with a BSBA in accounting with 150 hours (changed majors several times, extra hours added up). Right now, I am an exam candidate for another jurisdiction (let’s just say Jurisdiction B) that did not have a residency requirement and would let me sit with 120 hours, and more importantly, let me sit without having the 30 hours of upper-level accounting courses included in the 150 hours required JUST TO SIT in this other particular jurisdiction I want to be licensed in (Jurisdiction A). Now, having the 150 hours already and the 24 hours of upper-level accounting courses, it’s sort of an insult to me that I couldn’t even SIT for the exam in Jurisdiction A, but I digress.
So while I have been able to at least sit for the exam in Jurisdiction B, I can’t be licensed there without these two upper-level accounting courses that make up the 30 hours of upper-level accounting courses required in the 150 hours. I had fully planned to take these two courses before the end of the year and transfer my exam scores from Jurisdiction B to Jurisdiction A upon passing all parts – that is, up until what I learned today from Jurisdiction A’s public accountancy office. I only called them to see if these particular classes would be accepted by them as the requirement for the 6 hours of upper-level accounting courses I lacked. The advice I got was not to even take the courses and get licensed in a jurisdiction that didn’t require them (let’s call it Jurisdiction C – one that only requires 24 upper-level accounting courses and 150 hours) and to then apply for a reciprocal license in Jurisdiction A! So, basically, if you are with me here…. I could either pay $1100 to take these two particular classes I lack and have my scores transferred from Jurisdiction B to Jurisdiction A for licensure OR transfer my scores from Jurisdiction B to Jurisdiction C for licensure and just pay for a reciprocal license which is only $100 to be licensed in Jurisdiction A! So, essentially, when it all comes down to it, I’d be paying $125 for licensure in Jurisdiction C (score transfer fee plus application fee), then $100 for reciprocal license in Jurisdiction A. $225 vs $1100. Nearly $900 in savings!!!!
So what I plan to do is pass my remaining two exams, transfer my scores to Jurisdiction C, get licensed, then get a reciprocal license in Jurisdiction A. My question is… has anyone else done this? And also, how has this “loophole” not been noticed by the boards? I was so shocked she told me that information. She saved me $900. I get the feeling most state boards would not even think about it that way and would just tell you to take those extra courses.
In any case, loopholes people! They will save you money and time!
- The topic ‘Licensing Jurisdiction Loophole’ is closed to new replies.