[FTZ]

I just got my report – I scored “weaker” on every area of MCQ except NFP (8-12%) where I was “stronger” AND I was weaker on SIMS too – and I thought I rocked those. So how did I only fail by just 4 points? I can only imagine that I aced NFP and was just below “comparable” on the rest.

I’m also really surprised about not doing better on SIMS. I really wonder about the scoring of these tests but I guess I’ll re-study everything and take another run at it in the summer.

B: 77 (LC), 75
A: 63,74,88
R: 60,67,80
F: 71,74,74 again, and 86 - DONE!

Ethics and application - done.

Licensed in VA - 07/03/2014

[topharry123]

I think the score report means weaker than people that passed. So if you scored 70% on each section and the average score on that section of people that passed was 75%, then it would show as weaker.

FAR - 95
REG - 93
AUD - 91
BEC - 85

[henryv]

Just remember, there's a sampling risk in every statistics.

I was comparable on understanding the engagement and Weaker on professional responsibilities, but I got a 90 on AUD

Meanwhile, I got stronger for every subject for FAR but I got a 92 on it.

Quoting california's statement about the status report: As you review your performance, keep in mind that there is some imprecision in all assessments, especially when results are based on a smaller number of test questions. Your examination performance could differ from one day to the next, depending on a variety of factors.

That's why it is best to study without relying on these statistics. Rely on your self assessment as it is the most reliable.

FAR - 92 02/2013
AUD - 90 05/2013
REG - 85 10/2013
BEC - 80 12/2013

I'M DONE. THANK YOU LORD!

[Author]

Replies