Why is Wiley's price elasticity of demand formula different than Becker's?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #171857
    ppilot
    Participant

    This is Wiley’s Formula

    (Q2-Q1)/(Q2+Q1)/2 / (P2-P1)/(P2+P1)/2

    Becker

    Point Method

    (Q2-Q1)/Q1 / (P2-P1)/P1

    Midpoint Method

    (Q2-Q1)/(Q1+Q2) / (P2-P1)/(P1+P2)

    At this point I have all three memorized but since Becker vs Wiley produces different answers this is really bugging me. Thanks for any input.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #347754
    OUCPA84
    Member

    Ahhh my comfort zone, haven't studied BEC yet, so here we go with some help from Wiki:

    It's simply:

    %Change in Quantity Demanded / %Change in Price = (change in Qd/Q) / (change in P/P)

    However, to improve accuracy we can use the “Point-Price Elasticity” or “Arc – Elasticity”

    Since differential calculus is not part of the CPA exam 🙁 *I'm guessing they want you to use Arc-Elasticity:

    [(P1+P2/2) / (Q1+Q2/2)] x change Qd / change P **add a sprinkle of Algebra and we get:

    (P1+P2 / Q1+Q2) x change Qd / change P

    Which equals your midpoint formula (avg P and avg Q are your two coordinates of the midpoint of the straight line between the two given points) and implicitly assumes linearity between those two points for an accurate approximation of elasticity.

    Economists do not like non-linearity, (everything worth studying in economics is pretty much non-linear as it involves complex systems of irrational human beings), which is why after a Bachelors and a M.A. in Economics I decided to pursue accounting which would allow me to actually perform a useful skill/service.

    Hope this helped.

    This reminded me how much I enjoy math as opposed to studying for the CPA exam, thanks 🙂

    Now back to REG 🙁

    AUD Pass
    REG Fail, Rematch TBA
    FAR 11/26 Certain I failed
    BEC ?

    Becker

    #347755
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I just took BEC last week and the formula I memorized with Roger & Wiley were:

    % change in quantity / % change in price

    ARC Method:

    (change in quantity/avg quantity) / (change in price/avg price)

    Point of inflection is 1. Anything >1 = elastic, anything < 1 = inelastic.

    #347756
    rmm91909
    Participant

    I agree with CashMoney I took it last week and those are the two I memorized as well and was fine.

    #347757
    ppilot
    Participant

    Thanks for the clarification!

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Why is Wiley's price elasticity of demand formula different than Becker's?’ is closed to new replies.