- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Wow. Now I know what everyone means when they say “you have no idea how you did when you walk out of the exam.” I’m not sure if I’d be more surprised at a 60 or a 95. It could be either.
Anyway, here’s what happened. My initial gameplan was to give myself an hour for the writing section. Absolutely BREEZED through the first testlet, and was kind of disappointed at how easy it was. 2nd testlet got harder, which made me happy, as I assumed I got a more difficult testlet. I can’t remember the degree of difficulty to be exact, but I felt pretty good about it overall. Not great, but “OK.”
3rd testlet was just insane. Absolutely insane. Not exaggerating when I say I’d be happy to get a 50% on it. Even if it did “computer adapt” to a hard testlet, I still did horrible on it and probably only got about 40% of questions correct. I wound up taking so much time on the 3rd testlet that I only gave myself 52 minutes on the essays, and wasn’t happy with them. Rushed them.
Has anyone else been blindsided by a harder testlet, yet done ok on the exam? I understand how computer-adaptiveness works, but I don’t see how I could only get 40% of questions correct on an entire testlet and still pass.
Pretty disappointed with the way the exam finished after such a strong start. Would appreciate any honest thoughts on the computer-adaptiveness.
- The topic ‘Took my first section ever today (BEC). Questions about computer-adaptiveness…’ is closed to new replies.