@SheaBird125
As you'll gather from reading other posts on this forum, there's disagreement as to how well Becker does on REG. I thought it was better than BEC mainly because it was organized better. I used the Becker text and passmaster questions, the Wiley test and test bank, and the Ninja notes. I thought the following of Becker –
Pros – good coverage of business law, pretty good coverage of tax
Cons – way too much ancillary material with the implication that it's unlikely to be tested (don't believe this), confusion as to which tax laws are being tested since the text was published prior to the tax law extensions at the end of 2010 (I took my exam 4/29 and some topics were updated but many weren't)
Some people have said that Becker did a good job preparing them for the MCQ as long as you study all the text; I studied the ancillary material and thought it did a decent job for about 80-85%. Nothing can prepare you for the SIMS. A few people have said they were tough but fair; most, however, saw at least 1 or 2 that were unbelievable and like nothing they saw in Becker. Another complaint that several people had (including myself) is the wording of questions. Even if you know the material, it's tough to give the right answer if you can't understand the question. There's always going to be a couple of questions that are confusing, but I found REG to be the worst as far as both the degree of confusion and the number of questions like this.
I didn't have access to the videos so I don't know if they are addressing this as they get feedback on the exam. If I were you, I'd make sure to get info re the updates associated w/ the recent tax law changes and those related to the new material to be covered as of July.
Good luck!!!! I hope I'm not having to go through it again, although I'm afraid I might.
FAR 4/1/11 - 89
AUD 4/15/11 - 85
REG 4/29/11 - 80
BEC 5/13/11 - 85