- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by .
-
Topic
-
I am reading through BEC 3 for the second time (and MCQs) and I am struggling with the concept of permanent working capital vs. temporary.
My MCQs practice reveals that.
a. Matching Temporary WC with Current Liabilities reduces risk of technical insolvency (inability to pay)
b. Matching Perm WC with Current Liabilities increases the risk of inability to pay
My issues are as follows:
1. My interpretation of this is temporary WC is accounts receivable or cash/AR. However, permanent working capital is inventory/prepaids/ current deferred tax asset. Permanent working capital is harder to liquidate because:
a. it does not liquidate or
b. in the case of inventory, it is difficult to liquidate large amounts in a short period of time without taking a loss.
a. Is this interpretation correct? Is there a good review material that is pin-pointing this explanation?
b. Is the minimum/compensating balance in a bank considered permanent working capital? Do you have any reference/support for this?
2. My studies revealed that short term debt requires higher temporary working capital levels (consistent with above). What I do not understand completely is the concept that long term debt requires higher permanent working capital levels.
Is this because lenders require a higher level of inventory (lenders may loan up to a percentage of AR or Inventory)?
Is this because a compensating balance is considered permanent working capital (restricted cash concept)?
REG 80 2/7/11
FAR 91 10/8/11
AUD 97 11/22/11
BEC 96 2/4/12CPA 3/15/13
- The topic ‘Temporary vs. Perm Working Capital’ is closed to new replies.