- This topic has 4 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
hi,
I still don’t understand why the normal spoilage not included in the Equivalents units? I think it’s part of the inventory cost.
Can some please advise. Thank you for the help!!
Question
Barkley Company adds materials at the beginning of the process in department M. Data concerning the materials used in March of the current year’s production are as follows:
Work-in-process at March 1 16,000
Started during March 34,000
Completed and transferred to next department during March 36,000
Normal spoilage incurred 4,000
Work-in-process at March 31 10,000Using the weighted-average method, the equivalent units for the materials unit cost calculation are
A. 30,000
B. 34,000
C. 40,000
D. 46,000Explanation
The correct answer is D. There are two main methods used for calculating equivalent units in process costing: FIFO and weighted average (WA). The main difference between the WA and FIFO methods for process costing is that under FIFO, separate equivalent units (EU) and related costs must be determined for beginning work-in-process (WIP) inventory and current period production. With WA, current costs are combined with prior period costs and all units are carried at an average cost of production. The key to WA is that all units completed during the period are started and completed during that period. Therefore, the percentage of work performed last period on the beginning work-in-process inventory is ignored.Using WA, the beginning WIP and the units started in the current period are considered together as a single group of units for the allocation of materials cost. Because materials are added at the beginning of the process, materials cost are allocated even to those units which remain in WIP at the end of the period, since materials have already become part of the units.
With the weighted average method of process costing, all units completed during a particular period are accounted for as a single grouping or batch. There is no distinction between completed units which were begun during the period and those units which were already in process at the beginning of the period.
Normal spoilage (vs. abnormal spoilage) becomes part of the costs of good production since it is anticipated that every production process will have a certain degree of normal spoilage. As a result, the equivalent units calculation will not allocate an amount for normal spoilage because it will be absorbed in determining the cost for the good units produced.
The equivalent units for the materials unit cost calculation is as follows:
Completed units in March 36,000
Add: March 31 Work-in-process 10,000
Total equivalent units for materials cost 46,000
- The topic ‘Normal Spoilage in equivalent units’ is closed to new replies.