- This topic has 569 replies, 104 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
Theodore.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 14, 2016 at 8:44 pm #836143
jeffKeymasterWelcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for BEC.
If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 6, 2016 at 10:53 am #853608
iamonlooseParticipantThis is my second go as well. Hopefully this will be the last time we take this damn exam. Good luck! you go out there and kill this exam on behalf of all of us.
October 6, 2016 at 10:54 am #853615
mckan514wParticipantOkay I got this right because quite simply it was the only answer that worked- but wouldn't reducing paper be a major disadvantage as paper provides a better audit trail?? or am I over thinking here?
A major advantage in the adoption and use of electronic commerce lies in the replacement of which of the following?
A.Accountants
B.Antiquated terminology
C.Obsolete inventory
Correct D. Paper documents
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2October 6, 2016 at 11:04 am #853620
iamonlooseParticipantI always assumed electronic provides better audit trail.
October 6, 2016 at 11:06 am #853623
mckan514wParticipant@iamonloose ha ha ha you may very well be right– I SUCK at IT- I might as well be reading Chinese…
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2October 6, 2016 at 12:05 pm #853669
mtaylo24ParticipantThis week has sucked so far. I have been so unfocused….I've been banging out these questions, but I feel like I'm just going through the motions. I'm drained from traveling this past weekend and I went straight into work Monday for month-end close. I think I've only been getting like 4 hours of sleep each night too. Sorry, just needed to vent, hoping to turn things around by next Saturday.
Here is what I've done so far this go-round…
Done all of the Becker HW MCQs
Done all of the Becker Final Review Questions (twice after I finish Ch. 6)
I'm 1/2 way through the Gleim questionsAUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)October 6, 2016 at 12:16 pm #853683
mckan514wParticipantHang in there MTAYLO24 the end is in sight. I hear ya about just feeling like just going through the motions- I literally had to stop studying on Tuesday because it hit me that I was just mindlessly sitting there answering questions without even processing what I was reading. Sometimes your brain needs a break I think…. So far I have gone through all of the Ninja MCQ's and am now going through all of the ones I missed– next week I plan on hitting trouble questions and I have re-written my notes once am hoping to get to do that one more time if not twice…. I REFUSE to let this thing beat me no matter how stupid it makes me feel….
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2October 6, 2016 at 1:19 pm #853714
mtaylo24Participant^^^I reset my Ninja this morning, all (111 hours of it), and it pained me to do it. I have considered going back now that I am more comfortable with a few of the calcs. I might just start with doing 10-20 question progress tests in between my Gleim sessions and see where that will take me. We got this!
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)October 6, 2016 at 3:45 pm #853866
strugglerParticipantmckan514w
The advantages of electronic commerce reducing paper documents are increased accuracy and timeliness of transactions. The “real time” processing through electronic commerce is more timely but the disadvantage is that the audit “paper” trail is eliminated. Auditors then have to obtain data more frequently.
October 6, 2016 at 4:23 pm #853882
mckan514wParticipant@crbecken omg THANK YOU! Perfect explanation!! I do not know why I can not make IT stick in my brain!
LOL@MTAYLO– I reset BEC Ninja the first go round and freaked out as I did it ha ha ha- now I don't remember the reasoning behind it…. this go round I am concentrating on trying to get my average score in each section higher… its tough…
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2October 7, 2016 at 1:11 am #854181
TheodoreParticipantI hate hate hate cost accounting. on chp2 and I am not understanding anything.. my scores are so bad 🙁
FAR: 66, 76!
REG: 76!
AUD: 72, 9/7/2016
BEC: TBADon't Stop When You Are Tired, Stop When You Are Done.
October 7, 2016 at 5:33 am #854200
mckan514wParticipantOctober 7, 2016 at 6:47 am #854206
mtaylo24ParticipantDang, I hit 100 ninja mcqs like it was nothing yesterday. Did like 200+ on Gleim. It is hard to skip around topic to topic on Gleim like it is for Ninja, so I will probably continue to use both. Plus I like the progress report on Ninja.
@McKan, did you hit the review phase yet?
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)October 7, 2016 at 8:19 am #854226
mckan514wParticipantI am inches a way from hitting review stage Mtaylo… that's my goal today is to try and hit it! Right now I am feeling energized because one question that plagued me to death last time and this time popped up again and it FINALLY!!! Clicked and I got it right!!! That has motivated me tremendously!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2October 7, 2016 at 12:47 pm #854383
Sticky NickyParticipantExplain to me why salvage value is not taken into consideration for depreciation expense here!? The calc's are based on $150,000 but it has a resale value of $10k. Shouldnt it be based on $140k not the $150k ? Question #: 264 Category: 3A2 Financial and Risk Analysis:
McLean, Inc., is considering the purchase of a new machine that will cost $150,000. The machine has an estimated useful life of three years. Assume for simplicity that the equipment will be fully depreciated 30, 40, and 30% in each of the three years, respectively. The new machine will have a $10,000 resale value at the end of its estimated useful life. The machine is expected to save the company $85,000 per year in operating expenses. McLean uses a 40% estimated income tax rate and a 16% hurdle rate to evaluate capital projects.
Discount rates for a 16% rate are as follows.
Present Value of an
Present Value of $1 Ordinary Annuity of $1
——————- ———————-
Year 1 0.8621 0.8621
Year 2 0.7432 1.6052
Year 3 0.6407 2.2459
What is the net present value of this project?A.
$15,842Correct B.
$13,278C.
$9,432D.
$(35,454)Explaination:
To determine the net present value of this project, set up an analysis of cash flows as follows:Annual Annual Annual Annual
Before Tax Tax Aftertax Aftertax
Cash Flows Savings Cash Flow Net Income
———- ——- ——— ———-
Investment Year 0 (150,000) 0 (150,000) 0
Annual cash savings Year 1-3 85,000 (34,000) 51,000 51,000
Depreciation effect Year 1 18,000 18,000 (27,000)*
Year 2 24,000 24,000 (36,000)**
Year 3 18,000 18,000 (27,000)*
Gain on Disposal Year 3 10,000 (4,000) 6,000 6,000
These depreciation effects are calculated as follows:Yr1 150,000 x .30 (depreciation) x .40 (tax rate) = 18,000
Yr2 150,000 x .40 (depreciation) x .40 (tax rate) = 24,000
Yr3 150,000 x .30 (depreciation) x .40 (tax rate) = 18,000* 18,000 – (150,000 x .30 depreciation) = (27,000)
** 24,000 – (150,000 x .40 depreciation) = (36,000)
Now determine the Net Present Value of Annual Aftertax Cash Flow by year.Annual Present Net
Aftertax Value Present
Cash Flow x of $1 = ValueYrly Total: Yr 0 (150,000) x 1.0000 = (150,000)
Yr 1 (51,000 + 18,000) x 0.8621 = 59,485
Yr 2 (51,000 + 24,000) x 0.7432 = 55,740
Yr 3 (51,000 + 18,000 + 6,000) x 0.6407 = 48,053
——-
Total 13,278October 7, 2016 at 12:57 pm #854398
Sticky NickyParticipantheres another that conflicts with other review materials. tell me why the gain on the sale of the old van is irrelevant? There would be a $2000 gain reported as net income which would then be taxed at the companies tax rate. seems pretty relevant to me:
Management at MDK Corp. is deciding whether to replace a delivery van. A new delivery van costing $40,000 can be purchased to replace the existing delivery van, which cost the company $30,000 and has accumulated depreciation of $20,000. An employee of MDK has offered $12,000 for the old delivery van. Ignoring income taxes, which of the following correctly states relevant costs when making the decision whether to replace the delivery vehicle?
A.
Purchase price of new van, disposal price of old van, gain on sale of old vanB.
Purchase price of new van, purchase price of old van, gain on sale of old vancorrect C.
Purchase price of new van, disposal price of old vanD.
Purchase price of new van, purchase price of old van, accumulated depreciation of old van, gain on sale of old van, disposal price of old van -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 13’ is closed to new replies.
