- This topic has 1,014 replies, 103 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200896
-
AuthorReplies
-
June 25, 2016 at 4:12 pm #766959
mckan514wParticipantLOL Amor- thats a GREAT description!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 25, 2016 at 5:32 pm #766960
AnonymousInactiveJune 25, 2016 at 8:05 pm #766961
Spartans92ParticipantAmor D, the pic is kinda fuzzy but it asks what is the cost per pound under the new ABC method and its asking about premium . So you divide it over the total pounds produced after multiplying its cost by its ratio (500/1000 current month production).
Good Luck!
BEC- PASS
June 25, 2016 at 8:16 pm #766962
AnonymousInactiveTry to click the magnifying glass icon on the pic so it will enlarge.
Thanks though for your reply.
June 27, 2016 at 11:41 am #766963
aatouralParticipantI hate that quetion. I have it marks ever since I started studying and I am still right there with AmorD. Lost!
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSJune 27, 2016 at 12:06 pm #766964
mckan514wParticipantOkay guys- HOW in the H—- do I hand calculate square root???? (I know this may seem like an idiotic question but I am a long way out of basic college math…. and grad school we used well you know financial calculators and excel like most normal businesses will require us to do)…. I know that SQrt it the number multiplied by itself…. but a number then divided by itself would be one….
THANKS…
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 27, 2016 at 12:58 pm #766965
aatouralParticipant@mckan514w don't thing about a number divided by itself. Think about a number than when you multiply it by itself it give you the one you are looking for. For example square root of 144, think of it as what number gives you that multiplied two times. Thus, 12 x 12 = 144 and 12 is the square root of 144. For me is more a memorization thing because the highschool I went to (another country) made you learn the suqre roots by hart all the way up to 15, but that is always the way I've looked at it.
But if you have Becker, the calculator does have the square root for you to calculate.
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSJune 27, 2016 at 1:06 pm #766966
mckan514wParticipantThanks for your quick reply AA– I only memorized them up to 12- ha ha ha— so at least I immediately knew that the SQrt of 144 was 12 :-)– These two questions that I came across were on NINJA…. which the calculator does not have the function… just checked my Roger's course and that one actually DOES have the function… I wonder how the AICPA one on the exam is…. (I can't depend on getting a handheld one- I got one for FAR but they refused to give me one for REG)…. anyway back to it thanks for quick reply.
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 27, 2016 at 1:43 pm #766967
aatouralParticipantMaybe some of the ones that already have taken the BEC exam will know :).
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSJune 27, 2016 at 4:42 pm #766968
aatouralParticipantOkay I just got confused!
When we are talking about aggregate demand and short run aggregate supply, we only have shifts in the curves, but with regular demand and supply curves we have both shifts and movements along the curves. Is that correct?
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSJune 27, 2016 at 5:16 pm #766969
mckan514wParticipantAA– I think you can have shifts and movements along both…. with the only difference between the two curves being that the aggregate curves represent the entire economy versus just an industry or specific product.
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 27, 2016 at 5:18 pm #766970
mckan514wParticipantOkay… so why is 2% fee charged agains the total receivables and not the factored amount (i.e. 80% of the receivables) which was what was actually bought?
The Frame Supply Company has just acquired a large account and needs to increase its working capital by $100,000. The controller of the company has identified four alternative sources of funds, which are given as follows.
Pay a factor to buy the company's receivables, which average $125,000 per month and have an average collection period of 30 days. The factor will advance up to 80% of the face value of receivables at 10% and charge a fee of 2% on all receivables purchased. The controller estimates that the firm would save $24,000 in collection expense over the year. Assume that the fee and interest are not deductible in advance.
Annual Cost
Interest on average balance
($100,000 x .10 rate) $10,000
Fee payable to factor
(2% of purchased receivables) 30,000
(.02 x $125,000 x 12 mo.) ——-
$40,000
Less savings on collection expense (24,000)
——-
Net Cost $16,000
=======Cost as a % = $16,000 / $100,000 = 16%
===and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 27, 2016 at 5:56 pm #766971
Kmay89Participant@mckan514w, I was also just looking at this problem because I had gotten the answer wrong the first time I did it. I believe it is because even though the factor company is only giving them 80% of the receivables, they are still buying all of the receivables so the 20% difference would be the factor company's profit once they collect the receivables. So the 2% fee is for each receivable purchased which is the total amount, not the advanced amount.
BEC- 93
FAR- 9/6/2016
AUD- 10/7/2016
REG- 11/21/2016Wiley CPAexcel Self Study & Ninja supplements
June 27, 2016 at 6:51 pm #766972
mckan514wParticipantwell Duh Kaymay that makes PERFECT sense– I swear half my problem with these questions is figuring out what they are asking…. thanks so much for clarifying this one!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2June 28, 2016 at 3:35 am #766973
AnonymousInactiveAre committed costs relevant or not relevant costs?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 63’ is closed to new replies.
