BEC Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 63

Viewing 15 replies - 931 through 945 (of 1,014 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #766959
    mckan514w
    Participant

    LOL Amor- thats a GREAT description!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766960
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Bummer!

    My NTS application for my BEC retake was returned to sender because I missed to check the box for felony and misdemeanor charge, yes or no.

    What a lovely Saturday!

    #766961
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Amor D, the pic is kinda fuzzy but it asks what is the cost per pound under the new ABC method and its asking about premium . So you divide it over the total pounds produced after multiplying its cost by its ratio (500/1000 current month production).

    Good Luck!

    BEC- PASS

    #766962
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Try to click the magnifying glass icon on the pic so it will enlarge.

    Thanks though for your reply.

    #766963
    aatoural
    Participant

    I hate that quetion. I have it marks ever since I started studying and I am still right there with AmorD. Lost!

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #766964
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Okay guys- HOW in the H—- do I hand calculate square root???? (I know this may seem like an idiotic question but I am a long way out of basic college math…. and grad school we used well you know financial calculators and excel like most normal businesses will require us to do)…. I know that SQrt it the number multiplied by itself…. but a number then divided by itself would be one….

    THANKS…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766965
    aatoural
    Participant

    @mckan514w don't thing about a number divided by itself. Think about a number than when you multiply it by itself it give you the one you are looking for. For example square root of 144, think of it as what number gives you that multiplied two times. Thus, 12 x 12 = 144 and 12 is the square root of 144. For me is more a memorization thing because the highschool I went to (another country) made you learn the suqre roots by hart all the way up to 15, but that is always the way I've looked at it.

    But if you have Becker, the calculator does have the square root for you to calculate.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #766966
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Thanks for your quick reply AA– I only memorized them up to 12- ha ha ha— so at least I immediately knew that the SQrt of 144 was 12 :-)– These two questions that I came across were on NINJA…. which the calculator does not have the function… just checked my Roger's course and that one actually DOES have the function… I wonder how the AICPA one on the exam is…. (I can't depend on getting a handheld one- I got one for FAR but they refused to give me one for REG)…. anyway back to it thanks for quick reply.

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766967
    aatoural
    Participant

    Maybe some of the ones that already have taken the BEC exam will know :).

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #766968
    aatoural
    Participant

    Okay I just got confused!

    When we are talking about aggregate demand and short run aggregate supply, we only have shifts in the curves, but with regular demand and supply curves we have both shifts and movements along the curves. Is that correct?

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #766969
    mckan514w
    Participant

    AA– I think you can have shifts and movements along both…. with the only difference between the two curves being that the aggregate curves represent the entire economy versus just an industry or specific product.

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766970
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Okay… so why is 2% fee charged agains the total receivables and not the factored amount (i.e. 80% of the receivables) which was what was actually bought?

    The Frame Supply Company has just acquired a large account and needs to increase its working capital by $100,000. The controller of the company has identified four alternative sources of funds, which are given as follows.

    Pay a factor to buy the company's receivables, which average $125,000 per month and have an average collection period of 30 days. The factor will advance up to 80% of the face value of receivables at 10% and charge a fee of 2% on all receivables purchased. The controller estimates that the firm would save $24,000 in collection expense over the year. Assume that the fee and interest are not deductible in advance.

    Annual Cost

    Interest on average balance
    ($100,000 x .10 rate) $10,000
    Fee payable to factor
    (2% of purchased receivables) 30,000
    (.02 x $125,000 x 12 mo.) ——-
    $40,000
    Less savings on collection expense (24,000)
    ——-
    Net Cost $16,000
    =======

    Cost as a % = $16,000 / $100,000 = 16%
    ===

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766971
    Kmay89
    Participant

    @mckan514w, I was also just looking at this problem because I had gotten the answer wrong the first time I did it. I believe it is because even though the factor company is only giving them 80% of the receivables, they are still buying all of the receivables so the 20% difference would be the factor company's profit once they collect the receivables. So the 2% fee is for each receivable purchased which is the total amount, not the advanced amount.

    BEC- 93
    FAR- 9/6/2016
    AUD- 10/7/2016
    REG- 11/21/2016

    Wiley CPAexcel Self Study & Ninja supplements

    #766972
    mckan514w
    Participant

    well Duh Kaymay that makes PERFECT sense– I swear half my problem with these questions is figuring out what they are asking…. thanks so much for clarifying this one!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #766973
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Are committed costs relevant or not relevant costs?

Viewing 15 replies - 931 through 945 (of 1,014 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 63’ is closed to new replies.