BEC Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 5

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 1,014 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #766089
    Anonymous
    Participant

    @Pony Boy, you're absolutely correct! Thanks. Please tell me this, why are we including the 3 jobs when the question references August? Maybe if I understand that, it'll help me.

    I'm tired of operating in fear and mediocrity. It's time to try. It's time to do. It's time to go.

    #766090
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @KG – those are the product totals for August … they make 3 things, apparently.

    #766091
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    This question blew my mind … it was recently released in 2015 … Just want to see if anyone else thinks it is crazy! lol.

    At the start of its fiscal year, a company anticipated producing 300,000 units throughout the year. The annual budgeted manufacturing overhead was $150,000 for variable costs and $600,000 for fixed costs. In April, when there was a beginning inventory for finished goods of 5,000 units, the company showed an income of $40,000 using absorption costing. That same month, ending inventory for finished goods was 7,000 units. What amount would the company recognize as income for April using variable costing?
    a. $44,000
    b. $36,000
    c. $45,000
    d. $35,000

    #766092
    monikernc
    Participant

    Is it B? Change in inventory, 2000 units. Prod>sales, absorp profit > variable profit. Fixed cost per unit $2. $40,000-4,000=36,000

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #766093
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    lol, yes, monikernc!

    It has so many elements to consider and then to top it off you have to remember that caveat about absorption … I wonder if it is no longer being tested because of the complexity. I am going to walk through that one a couple times!

    #766094
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Good lord. It's like I hit a roadblock as soon as I hit the Finance and Capital stuff, with all of the ratios. Will be switching to IT later today, hopefully that will be better. Using Gleim BTW

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #766095
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    Taking BEC Saturday morning (4/02). Ultimate cram session is beginning….

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #766096
    monikernc
    Participant

    MaLoTu – it really is as simple as taking the change in inventory and multiplying by the FOH per unit. knowing whether to add or subtract that result is based on knowing whether production is greater than, less than, or equal to sales. the basic premise is if prod=sales, absorp profit = variable profit. from there the signs follow each other. if prod>sales, absorp profit > var profit. if prod<sales, absorp profit<var profit.
    in your question inventory increased 2000 units over the period from 5000 to 7000, meaning prod>sales and absorp profit>sales. the difference in profit for the 2 methods is always FOH. the per unit cost of FOH is $600,000/300,000 =$2. $2*2000=$4000. since absorp profit is $40,000 and we know it will be > var profit when prod>sales, then $40,000 absorp profit -4,000 FOH = $36,000 var profit.
    much easier than the gymnastics they make us use to learn it.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #766097
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    #766098
    RWCPA
    Participant

    I'm with you Pony Boy. 4/2 at 11:30 am.

    #766099
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    Good stuff. How far along in the review are you? Trying to get a sense of reference.

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #766100
    RWCPA
    Participant

    I am using CPAexcel, Ive gone through all of the MCQs completed all lectures and taken 1 practice exam (on Saturday). As of now I am just jamming out as many MCQs as I can and reviewing notes. I will take another Practice exam probably tomorrow night or Thursday. How about you?

    #766101
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @moniker, yeah I get the math and the difference between absorption and variable costing … I was just disgruntled to see all those elements thrown together in a recently released question. It is not hard at all, really, but could cause a testing center melt down! haha.

    #766102
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    I am reworking the MCs for each chapter and then am going to do a practice test tomorrow and one Friday. I don't think I have time to work an WC examples, but will look over a few of them for general guidelines before Saturday. Hopefully that is enough…

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #766103
    lonestar
    Participant

    Help please!!!!!!!

    The CFO of a company is concerned about the company’s accounts receivable turnover ratio. The company currently offers customers terms of 3/10, net 30. Which of the following strategies would most likely improve the company’s accounts receivable turnover ratio?

    A. Pledging the accounts receivable to a finance company.
    B. Changing customer terms to 1/10, net 30.
    C. Entering into a factoring agreement with a finance company.
    D. Changing customer terms to 3/20, net 30.

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 1,014 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 5’ is closed to new replies.