BEC Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 8

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 813 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1406864
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    HAHA, that was me the other day phi! The standard costing formulas should definitely be written down the second that you sit down for your exam. Saved me in that category last time. I always forget process costing every time I revisit. I can't get ECON down to save my life, and I swear they create new questions up for that and COSO, so don't even bother relying on the MCQs for that one. This test is frustrating because you don't think that it is impossible like FAR, but they find sneaky ways to deny you points.

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #1406970
    Theodore
    Participant

    @jelani1911 the written part was ok. I scored good. I got a little bit of everything. hard and easy straight fwd questions. felt like all three testlets were manageable but i did struggle with a few questions. Honestly, I had too much going on towards the end of last year, too many exciting things that I didn't fully concentrate. I went days with out studying. Now I regret it lol. But now I am ready to get back and kill this last part. going for an 80 this time around. fingers crossed!!

    FAR: 66, 76!
    REG: 76!
    AUD: 72, 9/7/2016
    BEC: TBA

    Don't Stop When You Are Tired, Stop When You Are Done.

    #1422065
    mooseonloose
    Participant

    Hi all! I will be taking BEC on Feb 4. I m planning on using becker + Ninja MC. Any suggestions?

    #1422108
    afrieband16
    Participant

    @mooseonloose

    I am doing exactly the same as I did that for FAR and it worked out well. My exam is Feb 10. My plan is to get through Becker hopefully by Jan 25-26 and spend the time until my exam rewriting my notes, making flashcards and doing as many Ninja MC as I can. I'm currently halfway through B3

    #1422480
    adimaz
    Participant

    Hi @Jeff- & everyone!!

    The video was very helpful but it still seems a bit vague for me. I have CPAExcel but It was hard to get through through their lessons working full time and trying to finish my masters. Well I am done with my masters now so I would like to use the NINJA framework this time but i would prefer to be precise and know if I am falling behind the proposed NINJA study planners. I got all the Ninja materials from 10 point combo so for instance, for BEC you suggest 4 weeks of study time, so to NAIL the concepts and take Intense Notes should take a week (week1)at most? Another week (week2) for NONSTOP MCQS, then JUST RE-WRITE all notes for another week (week 3). And finally, ALL COMES TOGETHER, on the last week (week 4). What about REG, FAR & AUD that have 5 weeks study plan? Should add another week to NAIL the concepts since they all have more material to cover than BEC?

    Guys, please help I really would like to pass at least BEC and REG before the changes. I got my NTS for both BEC and REG good until 6/12/17. I would like to take BEC 1/25/17 & REG 3/1/17.

    Thank you!!! 🙂

    AUD – 47
    BEC – NINJA in Training
    FAR – 53, 51
    REG – NINJA in Training

    #1422539
    CPASF1
    Participant

    For this problem: can someone please explain why we do (1-.3) for bonds only and not the common stock and preferred stock. Based on my Roger text example while solving this problem I just did: (.4*.1)+ (.5*.1) + (.1*.2) but in the answer key it says we must multiple the bond percentages by (1-.3) Also, why do we always do (1-.3) and not just use the 30%? Thank you!

    A company with a combined federal and state tax rate of 30% has the following capital structure:

    Weight Instrument Cost of Capital
    40% Bonds 10%
    50% Common stock 10%
    10% Preferred stock 20%

    What is the weighted-average after-tax cost of capital for this company?

    8.2%

    3.3%

    7.7%
    9.8%

    #1422542
    afrieband16
    Participant

    @CPASF1 – you do (1-0.3) for bonds only because the interest expense you pay on the bonds are tax deductible. Therefore when calculating cost of debt, you use after tax amount or (1-tax rate) * bond percentages. For cost of equity, dividends are not tax deductible and therefore you ignore after tax amounts and use pre tax amounts, in other words, you do not multiply by (1-tax rate).

    Hopefully that helps!

    #1422555
    CPASF1
    Participant

    @afrieband16 thanks so much!

    #1423350
    Gandalf1234
    Participant

    Hey Guys,

    Do you know how much different the 2014 edition of the Becker materials are from the 2016 edition? I am willing to look up the codifications as a supplement but thought someone new of a list of the differences somewhere online. I hope to take BEC before all of the April 1, 2017 changes.

    Thanks,

    #1423508
    Aquafairy
    Participant

    Ardmore Enterprises uses a standard cost system in its small appliance division. The standard cost of manufacturing one unit of Zeb is as follows:

    Materials [60 pounds at $1.50 per pound] $90
    Labor [3 hours at $12 per hour] $36
    Factory Overhead [3 hours at $8 per hour] $24
    Total Standard cost per unit $150

    The budgeted variable factory overhead rate is $3 per labor hour and the budgeted fixed factory overhead is $27,000 per month. During May, Ardmore produced 1,650 units of Zeb compared to a normal capacity of 1,800 units. The actual cost per unit was as follows:

    Materials (purchased and used) [58 pounds at $1.65 per pound $95.70
    Labor [3.1 hours at $12 per hour] $37.20
    Factory Overhead [$39,930 per 1,650 units] $24.20
    Total actual cost per unit $157.10

    The total material quantity variance for May is:
    a. $4,950 unfavorable
    b. $14,850 favorable
    c. $14,850 unfavorable
    d. $4,950 favorable

    The answer is d. $4,950 favorable. (60*1650)-(58*1650)=3,300 * $1.50 = $4,950

    I am using Becker to study so for the solution I approached it as:
    DM Qty Variance = (Standard Qty – Actual Qty) * Standard Rate
    DM Qty Variance = (1,800 – 1,650) * $1.50

    #1423515
    ng3926a
    Participant

    The material quantity variance relates to Direct material/ raw material, or pounds in this case. The numbers you're using are units, which are not direct material.

    So the standard quantity would be actual units multiplied by the standard pounds, and actual quantity is actual units multiplied by actual pounds

    #1424567
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    How is the best way to go about studying IT? I feel like its a waste of time to memorize terms, when I need to keep the other sections in my head as well.

    #1424648
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I took test today and it had a lot of IT questions and more concepts than formulas.
    I'm kind of worried because I don't think I got many difficult questions.

    #1424654
    mrsfabburns
    Participant

    Hello guys,
    I am 100% new to the exam. I am applying tomorrow to get my NTS for BEC, I am using Becker but I also came across this group. I would love a study partner to bounce concepts off of. IS there anyone out there interested. I figure having someone to study with is a good help.

    #1424736
    Joe
    Participant

    Hello!

    It's exciting to feel the energy coming from this forum! My CPA journey has been a long one. I am looking forward to passing my last exam on January 23rd.

    The most success I have had is using Roger for the videos and Ninja MCQs.

    HiYa!

    Joe

    AUD 72/75
    BEC 73/ Re-take 1/23/17
    FAR 69/72/80
    REG 72/80

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 813 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 8’ is closed to new replies.