BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 50

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,158 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #749630
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    WHY IS THE INITIAL INVESTMENT OF 10 BOTH AN INFLOW AND AN OUTFLOW??????

    Assume that Straper Industries is considering investing in a project:

    Initial Investment__________________500,000
    Addl. investment in working capital_____10,000
    Cash flows before Income tax________140,000
    Yearly tax dep_____________________90,000
    Terminal value of investment__________50,000
    Cost of Capital_____________________10%
    PV OF $1= _______________________.621
    PV of annuity= _____________________3.791
    Marginal tax rate ___________________30%
    Investment Life _____________________5yrs.

    What is NPV of the investment?

    a. $175,000
    b. $58,000
    c. $1,135
    d. $(12,340)

    (140 – 90 depreciation) × 30% = 15 annual tax expense

    (140 – 15 tax) * 3.791= 473.875
    10 adtl investment *.621 = 6.21
    50 terminal value * .621= 31.05
    _____________________________PV inflows: 511.135

    500 Initial Investment
    10 adtl initial investment
    ____________________________PV outflows: 510
    ____________________________________________PV project: 1.135

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749631
    monikernc
    Participant

    Given the following data, what is the marginal propensity to consume?

    Level of
    Disposable — Level of
    Income ——-Consumption
    ———- ———–
    1. $40,000 —– $38,000
    2. 48,000 ——–44,000

    Select an answer:
    A.
    1.33

    B.
    1.16

    C.
    0.95

    D.
    0.75

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749632
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    @moniker

    d

    MPC
    6/8 = .75

    MPS
    2/8=.25

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749633
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Farwars they want us to assume that sometimes some projects require an increase in WC and that at the end that WC is sold. What I do not like about those questions is that sometimes different treatment is given (with the same scenarios) and sometimes they do not take into account all factors. For example in that mcq I would have thought that a tax would have been charged to the 50,000 and 10,000 sale of investmentat at the end. I have seen it in some mcqs and honestly is common sense to think that if a tax is being charged to operating income that a tax is charged to that sale too. Rant over…

    #749634
    monikernc
    Participant

    Yes farwars but i am out of cars for you.

    I don't get the whole terminal value thing. Plz explain.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749635
    monikernc
    Participant

    100 mcqs. 89% too many repeats of questions i get right.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749636
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    terminal value = salvage value?

    as for the varying tax effects of inflows and outflows, i have no idea.

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749637
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    moniker, here- stop doing repeats

    Which of the following capital budgeting techniques would allow management to justify investing in a project that could not be justified currently by using techniques that focus on expected cash flows?

    a. Real options.
    b. Net present value.
    c. Accounting rate of return.
    d. Internal rate of return.

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749638
    payaza2000
    Participant

    @monikernc

    I'm assuming you're using NINJA. I find it helpful to do sets of trouble questions. If they repeat, intentionally answer wrong unless you know how to work out the question.

    -> Doing this evening, it is quite revealing for some of my weaknesses.

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749639
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yes terminal value = residual (salvage) value. Or sometimes they can give the tax basis at the end. If it has a 8,000 tax basis and they sell it at 10,000 there is a 2,000 gain and I assume there is a tax on the 2,000. And if they sell it at 6,000 there is a 2,000 tax shield. NPV is my nemesis, I hope I do not see it much on the exam.

    #749640
    payaza2000
    Participant

    @cortes123

    I am assuming you are already knowing this, but make sure you multiply the correct % times the salvage value.

    Using your example above if you:

    Sell 10,000
    BV:8,000
    = 2,000 (1-tax rate)

    However:
    Sell 6,000
    BV:8,000
    = 2,000 (Tax Rate) = Your tax shield

    or at least I think. So much for BEC being the ‘Easy One' 😛

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749641
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    payaza you are right. And sometimes there can be cost to remove the investment. In that case that would be only a cash outflow. What I do not remember if its discounted or not.

    #749642
    monikernc
    Participant

    So terminal value is given as salvage value when they are not providing a price for which they sell at end of project. Hence, no loss or gain is considered. Thanks.
    Payaza, you are correct. Tax savings when there is a loss. Tax pmt when a gain.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749643
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    What monikernc wrote regarding the salvage value not having a price explains why there was no tax considered on the sale. Still we have to watch out when they give a price. Not feeling comfortable at all.

    #749644
    payaza2000
    Participant

    @monikernc

    Tax pmnt. So for our purposes we would just discount the net after tax.

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,158 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 50’ is closed to new replies.