BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 49

Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,158 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #749615
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The q regarding the MPS can be twisted and they can ask for the multiplier effect factor. In that case is 4 (80/20). I reached at the .25 at first by dividing 1/4 (same thing as 20/80). The way I know that the .25 is the MPS and that it can never be less than MPC in the current economy is bc of the multiplier effect. In theory in your mcq for each additional dollar spent by the goverment there is 75% additional income added to the equilibrium GDP since only 25% are saved by each increase in income or 20 * multiplier effect factor of 4 = 80.

    Is the answer C? 23% premium?

    #749616
    monikernc
    Participant

    farwars. the gdp multpiler = 1/(1-MPC), the solution is 80/20=4 is the multiplier. 1/(1-MPC)=4 and solve for MPC. 1/(1-.75)=4. MPC = .75 and MPS = .25. and yes, we consume more than we save

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749617
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    a. is correct.

    (1.367 fwd rate – $1.364 spot rate / $1.364 spot rate) * (12months /3 months) = 0.88% premium

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749618
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ugh I forgot to include the months

    #749619
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    I truly hope the handful of formulas I can remember will be enough to get a pass =( The more questions you guys post the more I realize I don't know/forgot!

    #749620
    monikernc
    Participant

    ((1.367/1.364)-1)*(360/90)=.88% i should add it is a premium because the result is positive.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749621
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    Net operating profit before taxes_$31,250,000
    Inventory____________________5,000,000
    Long-term debt______________40,000,000
    Depreciation expense__________9,000,000
    Change in net working capital____5,000,000
    Capital expenditures___________8,000,000
    Invested capital (net assets)____80,000,000
    Weighted average cost of capital ___ 10%
    Tax rate _______________________20%

    Which of the following measures the amount of free cash flow for Walkin Corporation for the year?
    a. $7,000,000
    b. $8,000,000
    c. $21,000,000
    d. $25,000,000

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749622
    payaza2000
    Participant

    Is it C?

    EBIT* (1-T)+ Depreciation- Capital Expenditures- Change in WC

    And I totally hate the Foreign Exchange Problems, I also forgot the months.

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749623
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    yes C is correct

    Ebit
    -tax expense
    +depreciation
    -capital expenditures
    -chg wc
    = Free CF

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749624
    monikernc
    Participant

    That was a good one on the free cash flows – i had forgotten it. Thanks for memory jolt. Keep them coming.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749625
    monikernc
    Participant

    A scattergraph is constructed for a certain mixed cost. The total cost observed at 2,000 machine hours is $16,000. The regression line intersects the cost axis at $8,000. What is the variable cost per machine hour for this mixed cost?

    A. $2.00
    B. $3.00
    C. $4.00
    D. $8.00

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749626
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    Is this even possible to solve if no PV values are given in the problem? I'm assuming it is a mistake in Wiley Book (or I am totally blind)

    Bennet Inc. uses the net present value method to evaluate capital projects. Bennet's required rate of return is 10%. Bennet is considering two mutually exclusive projects for its manufacturing business. Both projects require an initial outlay of $120,000 and are expected to have a useful life of four years. The projected after-tax cash flows associated with these projects are as follows:

    Year; Project X; Project Y
    —1—–$40,000—$10,000
    —2——40,000—–20,000
    —3——40,000—–60,000
    —4——40,000—–80,000
    Total–$160,000–$170,000

    Assuming adequate funds are available, which of the
    following project options would you recommend that Bennet's management undertake?

    a. Project X only.
    b. Project Y only.
    c. Projects X and Y.
    d. Neither project.

    (a) The requirement is to determine which mutually
    exclusive investment should be accepted. Answer (a) is
    correct because Project X has the higher net present value as calculated below.

    Net present value of Project X = $6,800 = ($40,000 × 3.170) – $120,000

    Net present value of Project Y = $5,310 = [($10,000 × 0.909) + ($20,000 × 0.826) + ($60,000 × 0.751)
    + ($80,000 × 0.683)] – $120,000

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749627
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    @monikernc

    16= m(2) + 8
    m= 4

    c?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749628
    monikernc
    Participant

    Farwars, you win a beautiful almost new car!

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749629
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Man I hope I do not have to do the PV and PV of annuities formulas on the exam.

Viewing 15 replies - 721 through 735 (of 1,158 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 49’ is closed to new replies.