Is this even possible to solve if no PV values are given in the problem? I'm assuming it is a mistake in Wiley Book (or I am totally blind)
Bennet Inc. uses the net present value method to evaluate capital projects. Bennet's required rate of return is 10%. Bennet is considering two mutually exclusive projects for its manufacturing business. Both projects require an initial outlay of $120,000 and are expected to have a useful life of four years. The projected after-tax cash flows associated with these projects are as follows:
Year; Project X; Project Y
—1—–$40,000—$10,000
—2——40,000—–20,000
—3——40,000—–60,000
—4——40,000—–80,000
Total–$160,000–$170,000
Assuming adequate funds are available, which of the
following project options would you recommend that Bennet's management undertake?
a. Project X only.
b. Project Y only.
c. Projects X and Y.
d. Neither project.
(a) The requirement is to determine which mutually
exclusive investment should be accepted. Answer (a) is
correct because Project X has the higher net present value as calculated below.
Net present value of Project X = $6,800 = ($40,000 × 3.170) – $120,000
Net present value of Project Y = $5,310 = [($10,000 × 0.909) + ($20,000 × 0.826) + ($60,000 × 0.751)
+ ($80,000 × 0.683)] – $120,000
FAR- 80
BEC- 75
AUD- 78
REG- ?