BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 32

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 1,158 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #749360
    monikernc
    Participant

    Yes and remember ROI and residual income are presented in BEC, in this context, as performance measures for investment centers. ROI is a real ratio of net income/total assets but performance measures use it as that rather than strictly profitability.
    Hopefully, mgmt isn't pulling a rate of return out of thin air. Could be IRR, WACC, or cost of debt, or a desired rate based on industry – whatever it is they are measuring performance against it.
    Keep in mind too that another way to ask that question, exam style, is: what is the imputed rated or ROI, when net income (or target income) is projected to be $4.85mill, Total assets are $19mill, and residual income is $2mill? Then you would back into $2.85mil/19mill = 15%

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749361
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    1) ROR=Imputed Rate? Or ROI=Imputed Rate?

    2)
    Dahl Co. uses a standard costing system in connection with the manufacture of a “one size fits all” article of clothing. Each unit of finished product contains two yards of direct material. However, a 20% direct material spoilage calculated on input quantities occurs during the manufacturing process. The cost of the direct material is $3 per yard. The standard direct material cost per unit of finished product is

    a. $4.80
    b. $6.00
    c. $7.20
    d. $7.50

    why D instead of C?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749362
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, guys for the quick response. I really appreciate it.
    I just got out of REG (6th attempt and currently waiting for the result).
    Now with this BEC, I am so scared of this part. I took this 3x last year scoring only 67 as my highest.
    I would really need not just some HELP, but REAL HELP to get through this bump.

    #749363
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @AmorD Good luck! REG is no joke! I felt that FAR and AUD were way more easy, I really hope that you passed.

    @Farwars direct material as the name states is the direct material used. So what they are saying with the 20% of normal spoilage is that the 3$ represent 80% of the ALL material used on the finished product bc 20%was thrown away.

    3% / 80%*2= 7.5

    We cant apply 20% to 3$ (3*1.2*2= 7.2) bc we would only be applying 20% to 80% of the cost.

    EDIT: not used but applied directly. They used 3.75 but applied 3 bc they threw away .75

    #749364
    monikernc
    Participant

    Farwars, 7.50 * .8 = $6, it is how the question is worded. So $6/.8 = 7.50

    The desired rate of return for ROI can be imputed. Or ROI can be the actual rate when it is computed by NI/ total assets.

    Imputed means ” to assign a value to something by inference from the value of the products or processes to which it contributes.”

    So when you have a desired rate, or have to “back” in to a rate you are imputing it. Depends on context.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749365
    jpowell31
    Participant

    I just had a panic moment when I did a question (Ninja MCQ, didn't write the number down so can't copy right now) that mentioned leases….I realized I hadn't done this in detail at all like I had when sitting for exams previously (I'm on CPA round 2 after passing AUD, REG, BEC then losing them all about a year ago….long story).. then I realized that it's FAR that goes into great detail on capital vs. operating leases, not BEC (phew….right?)

    Clicking on the additional info that Ninja allows you to do at the bottom of the answer area when doing MCQ, it listed capital and operating lease attributes in detail. Can someone just confirm I can ignore this detail for BEC…… 4 days to the exam and the anxiety is REAL 🙂

    #749366
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    For BEC, just know the general definitions of both Operating (I.S.) and Financing (B.S.) leases, and that they are both methods of Long Term financing.

    FAR gets much more complex with calculations and JEs.

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749367
    SaveBandit
    Participant

    Is anyone else using Becker + Ninja MCQ? I can't help but notice how drastically different the questions are. Becker is very calculation driven with dense fact patterns and confusing language. Ninja has some tough questions as well but it seems to be more conceptual. The calculation questions in Ninja aren't quite as intense as the Becker ones. I'm also confused by the fact that Becker tells you it's a “mostly conceptual exam” and then proceeds to throw horrible calculation questions at you.

    I'm finding this section to be much harder than FAR in terms of material and also in terms of getting a feel for how the test is going to be on exam day.

    4 for 4

    FAR 85
    AUD 94
    BEC 86
    REG 90

    #749368
    payaza2000
    Participant

    @SaveBandit

    Yeah I noticed that too. NINJA seems to be more conceptual based. For the real exam who knows.

    Currently going back through with the NINJA Books on Economics and I had a conceptual question.

    The NINJA book says that Marginal Cost is the “change in total cost with producing one more unit.” Marginal Revenue is the increase in total revenue you get from “producing one more unit.”

    So conceptually speaking if MR> MC producing more will increase profits, if MC> MR will decrease profits. The book says that profit maximization is MR=MC (and I know why) but my question is isn't this firm specific? If your Marginal Revenue exceeds you Marginal Cost isn't that your profit maximizing point>

    @Amor Good luck.

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749369
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @savebandit, I am using Becker and agree, this is way worse than FAR. Everyone told me that this is the easiest section and I am mad I listened to that – I really wish I had left AUD for last. My struggle is epic right now.

    Since you are using Becker and Ninja, quick question: does Ninja have a lot of MCQ on constant grown, zero growth, and PEG calculations? (These MCQ are the Financial Valuation section of B6 in Becker.) Becker does a crap job explaining these, I can never get them right, and there are only 6 MCQs on these (out of a total of 1150+). I am considering ignoring these as I have bigger fish to fry…but I was wondering if they are emphasized in Ninja?

    #749370
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ok, I have two questions. First, can someone list out exactly what goes into applied OH (i.e., is it variable, fixed, direct, indirect)? When I took cost in school the book showed all the JEs and it was so much easier to see how all the accounting worked, and when it comes to OH I sometimes feel totally lost.

    Secondly, in chapter B6 of Becker there is a section called Financial Valuations (only 13 MCQ in this section). 6 of those MCQ have calculations dealing with PEG ration, constant growth/zero growth stock, etc. Are you seeing these items pop up in Ninja? And for my Becker users, are you devoting time to these items? I struggle with these concepts and feel like a better investment of my time would be to focus on the bigger sections but I hate to just ‘skip' material. Thoughts?

    #749371
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good mcq for understanding Responability Accounting:

    Brent Co. has intracompany service transfers from Division Core, a cost center, to Division Pro, a profit center. Under stable economic conditions, which of the following transfer prices is likely to be most conducive to evaluating whether both divisions have met their responsibilities?

    A. Actual cost

    B. Standard variable cost

    C. Actual cost plus mark-up

    D. Negotiated price

    #749372
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    A or B- I'm allowed to choose 2 answers right?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749373
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    Question asks for pre-tax savings and you are supposed to come up w/ this equation, but I am having a hard time understanding it. Please Explain:

    x=(x-60)(.4)+90

    where:
    x= pre-tax savings
    60= depreciation expense
    .4=tax rate
    90=after tax cash savings

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749374
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Only if you were Obi-wan haha… (Star Wars fan btw) The answer is B. This is the explanation per Ninja:

    Responsibility accounting is segmented reporting useful in management and control that breaks the enterprise into organization subdivisions that are responsible for costs, profits, and investments according to the unit's ability to control these activities. Each center is judged on the basis of an evaluation of its performance relative to the activities over which it has control.

    Variable costs include direct costs that can generally be controlled by the division to which they are allocated. “Actual cost” and “Actual cost plus mark-up” are incorrect because actual costs can be controlled by the cost center. It should not be allowed to pass the excess costs over standard costs on to the next division. “Negotiated price” is incorrect because a negotiated price usually would include some profit margin for the producing division, but that division only exercises control over costs rather than revenues or profit.

    So basically bc the profict center cannot have allocated costs that it cannot control then standard variable is the best option since it protects againts that. Right?

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 1,158 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.