BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 24

Viewing 15 replies - 346 through 360 (of 1,158 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #749240
    payaza2000
    Participant

    How are people utlizing NINJA books and notes? I want to take a break from Becker tomorrow?

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749241
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    “The investment in the new machine will require an immediate increase working capital of $35,000”

    So we are including this 35,000 in our initial cash outlay. Conceptually what does this mean? Give me an example why our working capital went up after buying a new machine for the factory.

    @payaza: re-write them until your hand falls off?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749242
    Dojo4lyfe
    Participant
    #749243
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    All of the following are the rates used in net present value analysis, except for the:

    a. Discount rate.
    b. Hurdle rate.
    c. Accounting rate of retum.
    d. Cost of capital

    answer is c. But how would the cost of capital be considered a rate? Isn't it just a number?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749244
    Jordanlovefood
    Participant

    Trending 88%

    Actual Exam 89%

    Hours: 30

    BEC

    #749245
    KJ562
    Member

    Classic 75 score.
    Moving to FAR now!

    FAR May
    AUD ???
    REG ???
    BEC 75 @ 02/04/16 ...The best score ^^
    NOOB CPA CANDIDATE

    #749246
    payaza2000
    Participant

    @FAR_WARS

    I think it would be fair to say that Cost of Capital can be used as your hurdle rate its equivalent to WACC (Weight of Equity * Cost of Equity + WEight of debt * Cost of Debt) you would want to use it to find your discounted cash flows.

    When finding NPV you would never want to use Accounting Rate of REturn since it does not account for discounted cash flows.

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749247
    FAR_WARS
    Participant

    thanks.

    What is the advantage of using the “tabular format” in regards to the variances? Can't I just know how each is calculated and be done with it?

    FAR- 80
    BEC- 75
    AUD- 78
    REG- ?

    #749248
    payaza2000
    Participant

    I think an advantage of the tabular format is that it helps create a visual way of looking at the difference in variances, and allows you to see where its coming from (efficiency, price/spending)

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749249
    payaza2000
    Participant

    A company manufactures a product using one material per unit. The following information for the upcoming budget year is available:

    Number of units sold 14,500
    Budgeted beginning finished goods inventory units 1,500
    Budgeted ending finished goods inventory units 3,000
    Budgeted beginning direct materials inventory units 2,000
    Budgeted ending direct materials inventory units 1,500
    Direct manufacturing material cost per unit $5
    What amount is the total direct materials purchasing budget?

    A.
    $67,500

    B.
    $72,500

    Correct C.
    $77,500

    D.
    $80,000
    Question #: 1170 Category: 5C1 Budget and Analysis

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749250
    monikernc
    Participant

    payaza, do you need help with Q1170? if so, do T-accounts for Finished Goods and Direct Material (no Work In Process in this example) and work your way back to Direct Material purchases. You will 15, 500units. then 15,500*$5 = $75,500

    post again if you still need help

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749251
    payaza2000
    Participant

    No. I was good on this one. However this one I do need help with this one:

    Berol Company plans to sell 200,000 units of finished product in July 20X1 and anticipates a growth rate in sales of 5% per month. The desired monthly ending inventory in units of finished product is 80% of the next month's estimated sales. There are 150,000 finished units in inventory on June 30, 20X1.

    Each unit of finished product requires four pounds of direct material at a cost of $1.20 per pound. There are 800,000 pounds of direct material in inventory on June 30, 20X1.

    Berol Company's production requirement in units of finished product for the three-month period ending September 30, 20X1, is:

    A.
    712,025 units.

    B.
    630,500 units.

    Incorrect C.
    664,000 units.

    D.
    665,720 units.
    Question #: 1079 Category: 6B Cost Measurement Methods and Technique

    FAR 5/6/2015- 84
    REG 8/3/2015 - 87
    AUD 10/25/2015- 69 1/20/2016 -75
    BEC 2/26/2016- 80

    Thank you God

    #749252
    monikernc
    Participant

    i reworked and i think the answer is D?
    if so, july sales are known 200,000, calculate sales for august 200,000*1.05= 210,000, september 210,000*1.05=220,500, and october 220,500*1.05=231,525

    then calculate ending inventory for july 210,000*.80 = 168,000, august 220,500*.80 = 176,400, and sept 231,525*.80 = 185,220.

    units of fin product = Ending + Units Sold – Beginning. for July, 168,000 + 200,000 -150,000 = 218,000
    Aug, 176,400 + 210,000 – 168,000 = 218,400
    Sept, 185,220 + 220,500 – 176,400 = 229,320
    218,000 + 218,400 + 229,320 = 665,720

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

    #749253
    wombataholic
    Participant

    I came up with D – 665,720. This would be so much easier to explain if we could post tables.

    Anticipated Sales:
    July – 200,000
    August – 210,000 (200,000 * 1.05)
    September – 220,500 (210,000 *1.05)
    October – 231,525 (220,500 * 1.05)

    July Production
    Starting inventory: 150,000
    Production needed to meet July sales: 50,000 (200,000 – 150,000)
    Production for next month's sales: 168,000 (210,000 *.8)
    Monthly Production: 218,000
    Ending inventory: 168,000 (218,000 + 150,000 – 200,000)

    August Production
    Starting inventory: 168,000
    Production needed to meet August sales: 42,000 (210,000 – 168,000)
    Production for next month's sales: 176,400 (220,500 *.8)
    Monthly Production: 218,400
    Ending inventory: 176,400 (168,000 + 218,400 – 210,000)

    September Production
    Starting inventory: 176,400
    Production needed to meet September sales: 44,100 (220,500 – 176,400)
    Production for next month's sales: 185,220 (231,525 *.8)
    Monthly Production: 229,320
    Ending inventory: 185,220 (176,400 + 229,320 – 220,500)

    Total production for July, August and September: 665,720 (218,000 + 218,400 + 229,320)

    Licensed CPA
    Passed each section on the first try with Ninja Notes/MCQ/Audio

    #749254
    monikernc
    Participant

    tables would be nice. i eventually got there. it did make me think that using the spreadsheet during the exam might be helpful for these unless it just sucks so bad it is useless. i will put it on my list of things to try when i do the aicpa practice exam for bec later in the month. if it works i will set up the calcs to see if it solves quicker. may be a waste of valuable time but i will check it out.

    FAR 7/25/15 76!
    AUD 10/30/15 93
    BEC 2/27/16 82
    REG 5/23/16 88!
    Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
    and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
    if you want things to change, you have to do something different

Viewing 15 replies - 346 through 360 (of 1,158 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 24’ is closed to new replies.