BEC Study Group October November 2013 - Page 44

Viewing 15 replies - 646 through 660 (of 1,548 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #484055
    Amay
    Member

    I think I'm doing it wrong. The next question was for variable OH and I used my method, and got it wrong…

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! πŸ˜€

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently πŸ™‚

    #484034
    Amay
    Member

    OK apparently I forgot about the OH applied formula. Just figured out that we have to use the cost driver (DLH) to come up with an OH rate (given in this example) and then apply it to the std cost driver of actual level of activity (the actual DLHs used). For variable OH variance per my question above it would be $8 OH rate (given but can be calculated as $32/4=8) X 94,000 actual DLHs = $752K. Comparing 752K applied OH to the $740K actual variable OH gives you $12K Favorable Variable OH variance.

    Sorry for the multiple posts! Sometimes it help to “talk” these out.

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! πŸ˜€

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently πŸ™‚

    #484057
    Amay
    Member

    OK apparently I forgot about the OH applied formula. Just figured out that we have to use the cost driver (DLH) to come up with an OH rate (given in this example) and then apply it to the std cost driver of actual level of activity (the actual DLHs used). For variable OH variance per my question above it would be $8 OH rate (given but can be calculated as $32/4=8) X 94,000 actual DLHs = $752K. Comparing 752K applied OH to the $740K actual variable OH gives you $12K Favorable Variable OH variance.

    Sorry for the multiple posts! Sometimes it help to “talk” these out.

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! πŸ˜€

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently πŸ™‚

    #484036
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mary

    Becker #2 was an absolute joke. It is good to take and all but it doesn't resemble the real test (at least I hope my real score isn't that low).

    The real test was a bit more like Becker's #1 practice test.

    #484059
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mary

    Becker #2 was an absolute joke. It is good to take and all but it doesn't resemble the real test (at least I hope my real score isn't that low).

    The real test was a bit more like Becker's #1 practice test.

    #484038
    mary28
    Member

    @Bretton ok thanks you made me feel better!! I was ready to push back my date because I did so poorly on it.

    #484061
    mary28
    Member

    @Bretton ok thanks you made me feel better!! I was ready to push back my date because I did so poorly on it.

    #484040
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mary

    don't worry I was like oh shit…but it's ok. There were obviously some tough questions on the real thing but nothing too crazy at all.

    #484063
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mary

    don't worry I was like oh shit…but it's ok. There were obviously some tough questions on the real thing but nothing too crazy at all.

    #484042
    jeff
    Keymaster
    #484065
    jeff
    Keymaster
    #484044
    Qlad
    Member

    i can not understand these PVFCF….could someone pls explain

    FAR 72,71,81 πŸ™‚
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 πŸ™‚ I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 πŸ™‚
    BEC 76 πŸ™‚

    #484067
    Qlad
    Member

    i can not understand these PVFCF….could someone pls explain

    FAR 72,71,81 πŸ™‚
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 πŸ™‚ I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 πŸ™‚
    BEC 76 πŸ™‚

    #484046
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Not to this yet but…

    Assuming PVFCF stands for present value of future cash flows. Basically, it's looking at income you would get in years 2,3,4,5,,,etc and discounting it back to today's amounts factoring in interest rate.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #484069
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Not to this yet but…

    Assuming PVFCF stands for present value of future cash flows. Basically, it's looking at income you would get in years 2,3,4,5,,,etc and discounting it back to today's amounts factoring in interest rate.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

Viewing 15 replies - 646 through 660 (of 1,548 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group October November 2013 - Page 44’ is closed to new replies.