BEC Study Group July August 2017 - Page 12

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 347 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1594100
    kimphan
    Participant

    Hello,

    Sorry to bug. I got 1 more question that I hope someone can help:

    Baby Frames Inc. evaluates manufacturing overhead by using variance analysis. The following information apples to the month of May:

    Number of frames manufactured: actual 19,000 budgeted 20,000
    Variable Overhead costs $4,100 budgeted $2 per direct labor hour
    Fixed overhead costs $22,000 budgeted $20,000 $1 per unit
    Direct labor hours. 2100 hours budgeted 0.1 hour per frame

    What is the production volume variance?

    The answer is 1,000 unfavorable but I don't understand it's mainly based on the application of fixed factory overhead. Why variable overhead didn't play a role. Please advise.

    #1594193
    SONA
    Participant

    The production volume variance measures the amount of overhead applied to the number of units produced.
    It is the difference between the actual number of units produced in a period and the budgeted number of units that should have been produced, multiplied by the budgeted overhead rate.

    Production Volume Variance = Budgeted F O/H Rate (Actual # of units produced – Budgeted # of units allowed for production)

    I remember this as
    Production Volume Variance or Volume Variance = BFO/H (A-B)
    therefore your answer lies in first line and third line ; = $1(19000-20000) = -1000 unfavorable

    If they are not asking about variable o/h variance then it must be based on Fixed overhead. If you go through the skills of this section Mike brown explained it very well. Try to write down once again and understand the relation that why the variance result would be favorable or unfavorable, why the production relates to fixed not variable. I would suggest invest 10 minutes to write down and understand the relation. You will feel clear about the variances analysis.

    #1594196
    SONA
    Participant

    No sorries about asking the questions 😉 .

    This forum is to help us.

    #1594197
    SONA
    Participant

    Total Revenue Variance (Becker did not explained this variance in much detail)

    Revenue variances are used to measure the difference between expected and actual sales. This information is needed to determine the success of an organization's selling activities and the perceived attractiveness of its products.

    There are three types of revenue variances, which are as follows:

    Sales volume variance. This is the difference between the actual and expected number of units sold, multiplied by the budgeted price per unit. The intent of this variance is to isolate changes in the number of units sold.
    Selling price variance. This is the difference between the actual and budgeted unit price, multiplied by the actual number of units sold. The focus here is on the price that the company has been forced to accept in order to generate customer orders. When prices are driven lower than expectations, one may surmise the existence of considerable competitive pressure.
    Sales mix variance. This is the difference between the actual and budgeted number of units sold, multiplied by the budgeted contribution margin. This measure is used to determine the impact on the overall sales margin of differences in the expected mix of units sold. This is a particularly important variance when the products sold have widely differing margins.
    There are many reasons why revenue variances occur, including the following:

    Cannibalization. A new product generates sales at the expense of an older product.
    Competition. Competitors may have introduced products at attractive points that have similar or better features than the company's own products.
    Price changes. A price increase could dramatically reduce the number of units sold, while a price reduction may have the reverse effect.
    All three of these variances can be used to develop insights into the reasons why actual sales differ from expectations.

    #1595430
    SheilaTX
    Participant

    Ok, I just took the exam this morning and I won't be specific on content but I will say it was not concentrated on COSO and IT. My questions covered a little bit of everything, there was a lot of math.

    #1595502
    kenckang
    Participant

    i guess its a crapshoot. some people say they see a lot of coso and it and then there are people like ^

    #1595507
    kenckang
    Participant

    were the computational questions pretty similar to the test bank?

    #1595562
    FutureCPA18
    Participant

    I took the exam this morning and I felt lost. I had to guess on some questions and ran out of time. I Didn't finish one WC. I saw a lot of computational questions in the MCQ teslets. Cost accounting, COSO and few IT questions. Hopefully the ones I guessed were “pretested” questions. I just hope I got a 75.

    #1595735
    kenckang
    Participant

    @futurecpa18 did the writing sims have probe MCQ attached to them? the written response sims in ninja mcq have probe questions relating to the writing topic. wasn't sure if that is reflective of the actual test.

    #1595766
    hach3900
    Participant

    Hi everyone,

    I have my exam tomorrow and was wondering if anyone took the becker mock exams and how it compared to your actual score? I took both and feel drained.

    Thanks!!

    BEC – 8/7/17 first attempt
    AUD – N/A
    REG – N/A
    FAR – N/A

    #1595772
    FutureCPA18
    Participant

    @Kenckang, No the sims did not have MCQs.

    #1595775
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    Hello, everyone! I just started studying for BEC yesterday. So far I have gotten through COSO, macro/microeconomics, and am currently studying international activities. I have always struggled with exchange rates. How the currencies of one country can cause another to increase/decrease or what an appreciated/depreciated currencies does in the domestic and global economy. Does anyone have any good ways to explain this to me? You'd think I would have this knocked out through a Bachelor's and MBA degree but nope!

    #1595783
    kenckang
    Participant

    @summer

    pretend you and i are different countries and we trade with each other and we both have our own currencies. My currency is called Ken and your currency is called Sum.

    Scenario 1: 1 Ken = 1 Sum; our currencies cost the same. the demand for my currency is the same as the demand for your currency. it costs the same to either import or export.

    Scenario 2: 0.75 Ken = 1 Sum; Now my currency is a little stronger than your's. I can buy more of your currency with my currency. Because your currency is cheaper relative to mine, I will demand more of your currency because I can buy more with it. Therefore you have the Export Advantage. You will export more than import.

    Scenario 3: 1.25 Ken = 1 Sum; Now your currency is a little stronger than mine. Now you will demand more of my currency. Therefore I will Export more to your country than vice versa.

    Does that make sense?

    Think of it this way, the reason why China is the world's leader in exports is because they purposefully devalue their own currency to make exporting cheaper.

    #1595979
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    Thanks, @kenckang! For some reason, I always want to think that a stronger dollar is better when really it is better when it is weaker? It's hard for me to make sense of it since it would take more dollars to purchase a good in a foreign currency, but I understand why it can be valuable for exporting.

    #1596014
    Williams
    Participant

    @Summer. Whether the dollar being strong is a good thing or a bad things really all depends. Recently the strength of the dollar has not been good for the country, hindering exports etc.

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 347 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group July August 2017 - Page 12’ is closed to new replies.