BEC Question

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #179973

    So I am taking progress tests and I keep running into an issue with depreciation. I hope someone can steer me straight.

    When do you take depreciation into effect on your questions? So like I just answered this question:

    A. Manufacturing has a tax rate of 40% and the following operating data:

    Selling price unit $60

    V.Cost Unit $22

    F. Costs $504,000

    They plan to improve the quality and as a result will:

    increase cost from $3.50 to $5.50

    Acquire a $180,000 machine

    The machine will depreciate over 10 years S/L and the company wants and after tax income of $172,800, they must sell:

    A) 19,300 Units

    B) 23,800 U

    C) 22,500 U

    D) 21,316 U

    I was treating the depreciation like and increase to cashflow at $7,200 like you would in NPV and could not get an answer. In the answer it takes the entire 18,000 and adds it to the cost base making your numerator higher.

    Can someone help straighten me out on this? Why would you not treat depreciation like a cash flow item when you are calculating NPV?

    Oh yeah, the answer is C.

    FAR - 81
    REG - 81
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 81

    Ethics - Done
    State License Exam - Done

    License - Licensed CPA in Utah

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #434688
    Zaq
    Participant

    Depreciation is never used as a cash inflow or outflow.

    Depreciation tax shields, however, are non-direct cash inflows.

    Edit: Just reread your question. You're taking the depreciation tax shield in your example. Let me look at the question once more, but this doesn't look like your common NPV problem.

    Edit 2: barelyinsane to the rescue.

    FAR: 50, 76!
    REG: 74... (ouch baby, very ouch), 76!
    AUD: 65, 91!?
    BEC: 80! Aaaand doneskies!

    May 2012 to August 2013. Can't believe it's over.

    #434689

    They're asking for essentially a breakeven point but with profit included. That is a cost-volume-profit analysis and uses income.

    Capital budgeting, on the other hand, uses cash flows, including the indirect effects of depreciation. Since this is not a question relating to capital budgeting/NPV, you would not look at cash flows.

    #434690
    Zaq
    Participant

    So yeah. SP – VC – FC = Net Income Before Tax will be your foundation here.

    FAR: 50, 76!
    REG: 74... (ouch baby, very ouch), 76!
    AUD: 65, 91!?
    BEC: 80! Aaaand doneskies!

    May 2012 to August 2013. Can't believe it's over.

    #434691

    Hmm… it must me the depreciation that is throwing me off because I usually nail break even questions. So on break even, you add depreciation into the mix because it is affecting your net income like you were doing your normal financials. So I need to think in terms of financial statement not product costs.

    Got it! Thanks for the replies!

    FAR - 81
    REG - 81
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 81

    Ethics - Done
    State License Exam - Done

    License - Licensed CPA in Utah

    #434692
    Nicc87
    Member

    Never_give_up1 thanks for posting this question. It's really interesting to cover this tricky question before my bec exam tomorrow. I try to use CVP analysis and plug in fix cost(504000+18000)+profit(172800/.6)/cm)(60-22) but I got D. Can anyone tell me where did I go wrong ? Thanks so much!!

    AUD 82(08/12/2013)
    BEC 82(08/28/2013)
    FAR 76(11/27/2013)
    REG 76(12/06/2013)
    Becker Review and Final review.
    You are only as strong as your weakest link.

    #434693

    You need to account for the increase in 18,000 cost for depreciation and you also have to account for the $2 increase to variable costs.

    Try that now.

    Edit:

    You have to account for all costs in a Break even analysis. Not just product costs. I was only using product costs. But because you are getting to a net income item you have to account for all costs.

    FAR - 81
    REG - 81
    AUD - 82
    BEC - 81

    Ethics - Done
    State License Exam - Done

    License - Licensed CPA in Utah

    #434694
    Nicc87
    Member

    Got it !!thank u so much Never_give_up1!! Good luck with your review!

    AUD 82(08/12/2013)
    BEC 82(08/28/2013)
    FAR 76(11/27/2013)
    REG 76(12/06/2013)
    Becker Review and Final review.
    You are only as strong as your weakest link.

    #434695

    =172,800/.6

    =288,00

    TAX Consequences

    =288,000+18000 = 306,000 (Income needed)

    306,000=(60-(22+2)x-504,000

    810,000=36x

    x = 22,500

    TEST (Fake Income Statement)

    Sales: 22,500 * 60 = 1,350,000

    COGS: 22,500 * 24 = (504,000)

    Fixed Cost = (750,000)

    Deprecation (18,000)

    Income before Tax:288,000

    It is easier to add the tax shield after you find your beginning taxable income. It would be different if it was asking for a Cash Flow of 172,800

    Specifically, 172.8-7.2 (.4 * 18000) = 165,600

    165,600/.6 = 276,00

    780,000 = 36x

    roughly 21,667 for Cash Flow (not income)

    ALL 4 parts passed summer 13
    Ethics October 13
    Experience (waiting)

    Becker Only

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Question’ is closed to new replies.