PCAOB (AS) vs. Clarified Statements (AU-C)

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #2161735
    animalwithin
    Participant

    I’m having a hard time figuring out when to use the PCAOB (AS) Standards vs. the Clarified Statements (AU-C) for AUD authoritative lit. questions.

    Anyone know how to differentiate the two? Both has nearly identical standards on some things.

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #2162341
    animalwithin
    Participant

    Anyone???

    #2162464
    czuprynskim
    Participant

    one deals with publicly traded companies and the other doesn't. that's specified pretty explicitly in the first chapter.

    #2162506
    RoseMarie
    Participant

    It's my understanding that the PCAOB stuff only applies to issues (publicly traded companies) whereas the AU-C stuff applies to non-issues (not publicly traded companies).

    #2163385
    animalwithin
    Participant

    Correct but how does one know if the party in question is public or non-public?

    For example:

    Robertson, CPA, has performed an audit of a client’s internal control over financial reporting. Robertson is requesting certain written representations from management and is concerned about overlooking something important.

    This was AU-C. So every time it mentions an individual CPA, it's a non-public entity?

    #2163733
    czuprynskim
    Participant

    no it'll state whether it's an issuer or not. If they don't specify one or the other you have to assume non-issuer.

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘PCAOB (AS) vs. Clarified Statements (AU-C)’ is closed to new replies.