- This topic has 49 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
SeattleAccountant.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 18, 2012 at 5:17 pm #174012
TootsieMemberSo I thought it could be fun to have a game where we post AUD questions to help us study and if you know the answer, post it and ask another question. I’ll go first. What are the 10 GAAS?
FAR - 76
AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
BEC - 76
REG - 77never, never, never give up
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 20, 2012 at 9:56 pm #396886
MIA2CPAMember@sbarker
Quoting from Wiley:
Inherent risk refers to the likelihood of material misstatement of an assertion, assuming there is not related internal control.
The risk differs by account and assertion. For example, cash is more susceptible to theft than an inventory of coal. The risk is assessed using various analytical techniques, avail. information on the company and its industry, as well as by using overall auditing knowledge.
Quoted from memory:
Control risk is the risk that internal control is not operating effectively leading to material misstatement of the Financial Statements. For example, if the auditors tests internal controls and finds them to be effective, he would set control risk at a low level. A “low” control risk means that internal controls can be reliably relied upon. Conversely, if the internal controls are deemed not effective, internal control should not be relied upon and control risk would be set at “high” or “maximum.”
Hope this helps. Let me know if you need further explanation or how control risk affects detection risk.
For people using Becker, how are you guys dealing with the terminology in the A4 transactions cycle section?
It seems like I understand the segregation of duties but get tripped up by terms I've never heard of.
BEC - 84
AUD - 83
FAR - 82
REG - 81I'm DONE! CERTIFIED PARTY ANIMAL!
September 21, 2012 at 1:49 am #396887
ShayMemberthis is probably one of the BEST TOPICS I have see here.
Q:: If Deviation Rate=0, what does this say about Sample risk and true Deviation rate in Population in relation to Tolerable rate?
February 9, 2013 at 1:55 pm #396888
TootsieMemberBUMP
Q: True/False
An auditor can perform a review if he/she is not independent.
FAR - 76
AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
BEC - 76
REG - 77never, never, never give up
February 9, 2013 at 6:43 pm #396889
littlenumberrobotMemberFalse. Must be independent for reviews.
This one might be an easy one. But I am reviewing the reports section today.
What kinds of opinion is issued when no statement of cash flows is presented?
a. Unqualified
b. Qualified
c. Scope limitation
d. Adverse
CA CPA - All because of the journey listed below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAR - 53('10), 8/25/12 79 PASSED!
REG - 66('11), 69('12), 12/06/12 77 PASSED!!
BEC - 58('10), 74('12), 01/05/13 77 PASSED!!!
AUD - 43('11), 66('12), 69('13), 74('13) 7/29/13 85 PASSED!!!!!(Combinations of Roger, Yaeger, Wiley Book, Wiley TB, & NINJA Notes)
Ethics 90%
February 9, 2013 at 7:27 pm #396890
jamesbMemberFebruary 9, 2013 at 7:35 pm #396891
TootsieMemberI think it's qualified.
Q: An auditor can provide limited assurance on an agreed-upon procedures engagement.
FAR - 76
AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
BEC - 76
REG - 77never, never, never give up
February 9, 2013 at 7:36 pm #396892
littlenumberrobotMemberMy Roger book says its Qualified only because it is an omitted disclosure.
CA CPA - All because of the journey listed below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAR - 53('10), 8/25/12 79 PASSED!
REG - 66('11), 69('12), 12/06/12 77 PASSED!!
BEC - 58('10), 74('12), 01/05/13 77 PASSED!!!
AUD - 43('11), 66('12), 69('13), 74('13) 7/29/13 85 PASSED!!!!!(Combinations of Roger, Yaeger, Wiley Book, Wiley TB, & NINJA Notes)
Ethics 90%
February 9, 2013 at 7:46 pm #396893
AnonymousInactiveFebruary 9, 2013 at 7:50 pm #396894
littlenumberrobotMember@BAFR2013 both? That is in the next section of my review. I'd have to go look it up. But aren't they both the same, a forcast and projection?
CA CPA - All because of the journey listed below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAR - 53('10), 8/25/12 79 PASSED!
REG - 66('11), 69('12), 12/06/12 77 PASSED!!
BEC - 58('10), 74('12), 01/05/13 77 PASSED!!!
AUD - 43('11), 66('12), 69('13), 74('13) 7/29/13 85 PASSED!!!!!(Combinations of Roger, Yaeger, Wiley Book, Wiley TB, & NINJA Notes)
Ethics 90%
February 9, 2013 at 7:59 pm #396895
jamesbMember@littlenumberrobot..Did you make that question yourself or got it from your review? I would like to know complete explanation.
AUD: TBA-
FAR Done
BEC DoneBecker
NINJA for AUDFebruary 9, 2013 at 8:07 pm #396896
jamesbMember@BAFR2013…Financial Projection is Limited Use.(restricted use), whereas Financial Forecast can be both General use and Limited use..
AUD: TBA-
FAR Done
BEC DoneBecker
NINJA for AUDFebruary 9, 2013 at 8:07 pm #396897
littlenumberrobotMemberI did make it up myself. Direct quote from the book “One special violation is the failure to include a statement of cash flows in a set of financial statements. GAAP requires the inclusion of such whenever a company is presenting results of operation, i.e., an income statement. The failure to include the statement of cash flows results in a qualified opinion, but also requires modification to the introductory and opinion paragrach to delete reference to it”.
Roger 2011 Book page 7-11.
Does you review course say otherwise?
CA CPA - All because of the journey listed below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAR - 53('10), 8/25/12 79 PASSED!
REG - 66('11), 69('12), 12/06/12 77 PASSED!!
BEC - 58('10), 74('12), 01/05/13 77 PASSED!!!
AUD - 43('11), 66('12), 69('13), 74('13) 7/29/13 85 PASSED!!!!!(Combinations of Roger, Yaeger, Wiley Book, Wiley TB, & NINJA Notes)
Ethics 90%
February 9, 2013 at 8:16 pm #396898
jamesbMember@littlenumberrobot..I think your question was incomplete. I am using Becker.
its says, if No SCF, then the Auditor should issue qualified or adverse, depending on materiality.
To help both of us understand, I will reword your question
Q-What kinds of opinion is issued when no statement of cash flows is presented and Auditor is justified with the departure?
A–Unqualified, with Explanatory
Q-What kinds of opinion is issued when no statement of cash flows is presented and Auditor thinks its very material departure from GAAP?
A–Adverse
AUD: TBA-
FAR Done
BEC DoneBecker
NINJA for AUDFebruary 9, 2013 at 8:17 pm #396899
AnonymousInactive@littlenumberrobot..Becker says the same….I had to research to make sure but you are correct. Lack of Cash Flow results in Qualified opinion.
@jamesb…That is what I have as well.
Trying to take a break….really tired of studying now.
February 9, 2013 at 8:21 pm #396900
littlenumberrobotMember@jamesb Yeah Roger makes no distinction in regards to materiallity specifically with SCF. I believe it would be assumed when examining any departure from GAAP to assess the materialty, which you are correct, I did not address in my question.
But your 1st question listed is incorrect. It is NEVER unqualified.
CA CPA - All because of the journey listed below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAR - 53('10), 8/25/12 79 PASSED!
REG - 66('11), 69('12), 12/06/12 77 PASSED!!
BEC - 58('10), 74('12), 01/05/13 77 PASSED!!!
AUD - 43('11), 66('12), 69('13), 74('13) 7/29/13 85 PASSED!!!!!(Combinations of Roger, Yaeger, Wiley Book, Wiley TB, & NINJA Notes)
Ethics 90%
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘Let's play the AUD study game - Page 2’ is closed to new replies.
