You should definitely be familiar with the authoritative literature. You're guaranteed to have a research problem and that should be easy points. Additionally, since a lot of the audit material revolves around vocabulary and compliance with the AICPA standards, you may very well be able to look up some of the answers. Many of the simulations are an in-depth look at all of the minutia of a single topic. For example, if your simulation involves the criteria for Independence, or the regulations surrounding Reviews and Compilations or wording of the audit reports you'll have the ability to check for guidance in the literature. I'd advocate when studying that you try to answers the simulations from memory first, but if you get stuck see if you can find any guidance in the literature. Also, just knowing who issued the standard in question (AICPA, SEC, ect) can be helpful in trying to whittle down the long list of search results.
Also, study the financial ratios, both how they're calculated and how transactions may impact them. I thought the Becker review course was weak in reviewing these and the sheer number can be frustrating to try to learn and remember if you don't use them every day. Thankfully, many of the ratios are very similar, which helps with the memorization.
Lastly, I'd strongly recommend doing some basic journal entry review. (Expense and Revenue recognition, inventory and COGS, equity method, prepaids, investments, debt issuance, ect) as they could very well test you on either the actual journal entries of how the adjustments will impact the financial statements. Many of the simulations I saw when studying seemed like they were straight out of the FAR course, but I've heard plenty of stories of people needing to know journal entries on the actual test.
AUD - 97 5/30/2015
BEC - 86 5/31/2014
FAR - 88 8/31/2014
REG - 87 7/30/2015
.