Audit SIM – How to polish Audit Risk (IR*CR*DR) interpretations?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1549945
    santaclaws
    Participant

    I found the SIMs frustrating to no end.

    Would anyone please share with me the audit risk SIMs strategy:

    based on management’s decisions on XXX, how will it make

    IR increased/decreased

    CR increased/decreased

    DR increased/decreased

    and auditor’s action to the change.

    This is my last test and is my arch-nemesis.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1550250
    Ajay Rangarajan
    Participant

    Hope this help..

    Inherent risk and control risk is inversely related to detection risk- ..

    A detection risk is inversely proportional to Inherent risk (IR) and Control Risk (CR). If IR and CR is high, Detection risk is low. If IR and CR is low, Detection risk is high.

    RMM is high: this means that an auditor is not satisfied about the controls existing and there is a huge risk on the financial statements being materially mis stated. As a result an auditor would get into more detailed and corroborative evidence. The substantial procedure will increase and the sample size will also increase. Audit procedure will be extended to closing period as well over and above the interim period. It is not that no procedure will be done at interim. The chances that a particular mis statement will not be detected is low. Hence the detection risk is kept low.

    RMM is low: this is the other way. Here the controls are well in place and the auditor will not test/ check many samples. Here the chances that a particular mis statement will not be detected is high. Hence the detection risk is kept high.

    Inherent risk ..Inherent risk is the risk posed by an error or omission in a financial statement due to a factor other than a failure of control. So this always happens in financial statement
    Example, transactions involving exchange of cash may have higher IR than transactions involving settlement by cheques

    Control risk-
    CR refers to the risk that a misstatement could occur but may not be detected and corrected or prevented by the entity's internal control mechanism. Example,control risk assessment may be higher in an entity where separation of duties is not well defined

    Question will specifically mention abt any control laspe or good control.

    Detection risk- DR is the probability that the audit procedures may fail to detect existence of a material error or fraud. While CR depends on the strength or weakness of the internal control procedures, DR is either due to sampling error or human factors

    Mostly this you will able to judge the questions if it is is failure or success of audit procedure

    AJ

    #1550260
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    ^Exactly

    #1551154
    santaclaws
    Participant

    THANK YOU Ajay, would you or anyone reading this give out more examples to IR and CR like your post please?

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Audit SIM – How to polish Audit Risk (IR*CR*DR) interpretations?’ is closed to new replies.