AUD Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 7

Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 481 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #763280
    utaustincpa
    Participant

    Hi everyone. I had a question about the audit exam about the sampling topic.

    Do we have to learn how to solve questions like these

    In a probability-proportional-to-size sample with a sampling interval of $10,000, an auditor discovered that a selected account receivable with a recorded amount of $5,000 had an audited amount of $4,000. If this were the only misstatement discovered by the auditor, the projected misstatement of this sample would be:

    or

    An auditor established a $60,000 tolerable misstatement for an asset with an account balance of $1,000,000. The auditor selected a sample of every twentieth item from the population that represented the asset account balance and discovered overstatements of $3,700 and understatements of $200. Under these circumstances, the auditor most likely would conclude that:

    Any help is greatly appreciated
    Thank you

    – See more at: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/audit-help-sampling#sthash.nehZNSVC.dpuf

    BEC - 80 2/29
    AUD - 72, 76

    #763281
    mikemaaa
    Participant

    I am taking AUD next Monday…how does the practice exam score compare to the actual exam score for you guys? I'm still struggling a bit getting 74 on the practice…I still have a week left to keep doing it, but just wanted to see how it compares for ones that have taken it already

    AUD - 61 (expected, didn't want it)
    FAR - 7/11/16
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    #763282

    utaustincpa, u should know questions like that. the answer would be $2k for the 1st and the 2nd would be reject/fail the sample since sample would be beyond $60k tolerable misstatement. to your question, i never had a question that needed me to calculate such numbers but there is no guarantee they won't ask you.

    i'd know make sure to know a general question like the advantages of PPS sampling, advantages of classical variables sampling or the difference between the two before understanding calculation.

    i feel there are other things more likely emphasized… like the reporting requirements (what's on au-c reports, pcabo reports, ssars reports etc), which assertions given the circumstances would apply to, what the appropriate internal control to prevent and detect the misstatement is, how the auditor found the error etc…

    Licensed CPA since Apr 16
    Order in sequence of passing
    FAR-71,71,79
    BEC-80
    REG-72,77
    AUD-56,72,72,72,80! Thank you, thank you, thank you Lord!
    FAR/BEC/AUD: Becker & Yaeger lectures (Wiley & Ninja MCQs). REG: Becker lectures (Ninja MCQs).

    #763283
    cdn
    Participant

    When should management representation letter be dated?

    #763284
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    So, took the test yesterday. First testlet was manageable and was feeling pretty good. Then all hell broke loose in the second testlet. Several questions that I did not remember seeing or had two answers that both looked equally correct. I'm hoping the increase in difficulty was because I did well on the first testlet, but you never can tell with these tests. The third testlet was still difficult, but not as bad as the second. Had a lot more questions that I felt I could steal some points from. Overall the SIMs were about what I expected. They made you think, but weren't too crazy. Very happy I left myself more than enough time to tackle those. Now to wait until May 5th.. Hoping for the best.

    @capri1032

    The Management Representation Letter should be dated the same date as the auditor's report because the representations should cover the entire period of the audit.

    #763285
    cdn
    Participant

    Thanks everyone for all great answers 🙂
    Feeling good having all you guys helping with AUD struggle 🙂
    Test day on Monday, April 18!!!

    #763286
    mikemaaa
    Participant

    @pyacpa49 – are the sims on the actual test comparable to the ones on ninja? I went on the AICPA website to do the example exam and those sims scared the crap out of me.

    AUD - 61 (expected, didn't want it)
    FAR - 7/11/16
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    #763287
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @mikemaaa

    I didn't do too many sims from Ninja really. just tried to find as many research questions as I could to get practice with those. I would say the sims I had were a bit tougher. Definitely closer to the AICPA practice exam in terms of difficulty. Don't mean to scare you though, if you do the ones in NINJA and you truly look at them and understand the answers you will be fine.

    Honestly, though, after I got my butt kicked by testlets 2 and 3 (mostly 2) my brain was a little fatigued. If there was anything that my studying didn't prepare me for it was the length of time it took to do the sims on the exam rather than in NINJA/Wiley.

    #763288
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is the restatement of previous financial statements to correct a material weakness a material weakness? Or just an indicator of a material weakness?

    Does the auditor report fraud at all levels? I've read to report it when its material for employees, and to report regardless of materiality for senior management and key employees.

    Thoughts?

    #763289
    marqzho
    Participant

    Dmb2stepper

    For fraud
    how about,
    If immaterial, report to one level higher.
    If material, report to senior & audit committee

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763290
    NYaccountingstudent
    Participant

    I just purchased my NTS. I am aiming to take this test 5/27 if their is availability in my area

    #763291
    tacctfin11
    Participant

    Taking the exam tomorrow…Any last minute tips?

    FAR- 76 01/08/2016 exp 08/04/2017
    AUD- 82 04/14/2016
    BEC- May 28th

    baby

    REG- TBD

    #763292
    marqzho
    Participant

    What is compensation balance arranagment?
    And How does review confirmation of compensation balance arranagment helps ID related party transaction?

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763293
    Skittnator
    Participant

    @pyacpa49 I had the same exact experience when I took my test last Friday. First testlet felt like a breeze, second testlet left me scratching my head and re-reading questions over and over again. Some just plain didn't make sense. I feel comfortable enough with the material, but honestly I feel like the combo of the confusing 2nd testlet and some open-ended SIMS may very well have left me just short of the mark. I expect a high 60's to low 70's if I'm being realistic, maybe even lower… How….. unfortunate….. But I guess if it were easy everyone would be a CPA, eh?

    ya rite.

    #763294
    Andrew T
    Participant

    A4 in Becker is rough…

    FAR (2/29/16) - 84
    AUD (5/9/16) - 68; (7/16/16) - 90
    BEC (6/10/16) - 80
    REG (9/8/16)

Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 481 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 7’ is closed to new replies.