- This topic has 481 replies, 99 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
Theodore.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:42 am #200894
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 11, 2016 at 3:57 pm #763280
utaustincpaParticipantHi everyone. I had a question about the audit exam about the sampling topic.
Do we have to learn how to solve questions like these
In a probability-proportional-to-size sample with a sampling interval of $10,000, an auditor discovered that a selected account receivable with a recorded amount of $5,000 had an audited amount of $4,000. If this were the only misstatement discovered by the auditor, the projected misstatement of this sample would be:
or
An auditor established a $60,000 tolerable misstatement for an asset with an account balance of $1,000,000. The auditor selected a sample of every twentieth item from the population that represented the asset account balance and discovered overstatements of $3,700 and understatements of $200. Under these circumstances, the auditor most likely would conclude that:
Any help is greatly appreciated
Thank you– See more at: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/audit-help-sampling#sthash.nehZNSVC.dpuf
BEC - 80 2/29
AUD - 72, 76April 11, 2016 at 9:54 pm #763281
mikemaaaParticipantI am taking AUD next Monday…how does the practice exam score compare to the actual exam score for you guys? I'm still struggling a bit getting 74 on the practice…I still have a week left to keep doing it, but just wanted to see how it compares for ones that have taken it already
AUD - 61 (expected, didn't want it)
FAR - 7/11/16
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016April 11, 2016 at 10:06 pm #763282
If I can, u can too!Participantutaustincpa, u should know questions like that. the answer would be $2k for the 1st and the 2nd would be reject/fail the sample since sample would be beyond $60k tolerable misstatement. to your question, i never had a question that needed me to calculate such numbers but there is no guarantee they won't ask you.
i'd know make sure to know a general question like the advantages of PPS sampling, advantages of classical variables sampling or the difference between the two before understanding calculation.
i feel there are other things more likely emphasized… like the reporting requirements (what's on au-c reports, pcabo reports, ssars reports etc), which assertions given the circumstances would apply to, what the appropriate internal control to prevent and detect the misstatement is, how the auditor found the error etc…
Licensed CPA since Apr 16
Order in sequence of passing
FAR-71,71,79
BEC-80
REG-72,77
AUD-56,72,72,72,80! Thank you, thank you, thank you Lord!
FAR/BEC/AUD: Becker & Yaeger lectures (Wiley & Ninja MCQs). REG: Becker lectures (Ninja MCQs).April 12, 2016 at 3:50 am #763283
cdnParticipantWhen should management representation letter be dated?
April 12, 2016 at 1:02 pm #763284
pyacpa49ParticipantSo, took the test yesterday. First testlet was manageable and was feeling pretty good. Then all hell broke loose in the second testlet. Several questions that I did not remember seeing or had two answers that both looked equally correct. I'm hoping the increase in difficulty was because I did well on the first testlet, but you never can tell with these tests. The third testlet was still difficult, but not as bad as the second. Had a lot more questions that I felt I could steal some points from. Overall the SIMs were about what I expected. They made you think, but weren't too crazy. Very happy I left myself more than enough time to tackle those. Now to wait until May 5th.. Hoping for the best.
The Management Representation Letter should be dated the same date as the auditor's report because the representations should cover the entire period of the audit.
April 12, 2016 at 3:00 pm #763285
cdnParticipantThanks everyone for all great answers 🙂
Feeling good having all you guys helping with AUD struggle 🙂
Test day on Monday, April 18!!!April 12, 2016 at 6:09 pm #763286
mikemaaaParticipantApril 13, 2016 at 12:09 am #763287
pyacpa49ParticipantI didn't do too many sims from Ninja really. just tried to find as many research questions as I could to get practice with those. I would say the sims I had were a bit tougher. Definitely closer to the AICPA practice exam in terms of difficulty. Don't mean to scare you though, if you do the ones in NINJA and you truly look at them and understand the answers you will be fine.
Honestly, though, after I got my butt kicked by testlets 2 and 3 (mostly 2) my brain was a little fatigued. If there was anything that my studying didn't prepare me for it was the length of time it took to do the sims on the exam rather than in NINJA/Wiley.
April 13, 2016 at 2:21 pm #763288
AnonymousInactiveIs the restatement of previous financial statements to correct a material weakness a material weakness? Or just an indicator of a material weakness?
Does the auditor report fraud at all levels? I've read to report it when its material for employees, and to report regardless of materiality for senior management and key employees.
Thoughts?
April 13, 2016 at 3:05 pm #763289
marqzhoParticipantDmb2stepper
For fraud
how about,
If immaterial, report to one level higher.
If material, report to senior & audit committeeREG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84April 13, 2016 at 3:34 pm #763290
NYaccountingstudentParticipantI just purchased my NTS. I am aiming to take this test 5/27 if their is availability in my area
April 13, 2016 at 11:23 pm #763291
tacctfin11ParticipantTaking the exam tomorrow…Any last minute tips?
FAR- 76 01/08/2016 exp 08/04/2017
AUD- 82 04/14/2016
BEC- May 28thbaby
REG- TBD
April 14, 2016 at 4:39 pm #763292
marqzhoParticipantWhat is compensation balance arranagment?
And How does review confirmation of compensation balance arranagment helps ID related party transaction?REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84April 14, 2016 at 5:46 pm #763293
SkittnatorParticipant@pyacpa49 I had the same exact experience when I took my test last Friday. First testlet felt like a breeze, second testlet left me scratching my head and re-reading questions over and over again. Some just plain didn't make sense. I feel comfortable enough with the material, but honestly I feel like the combo of the confusing 2nd testlet and some open-ended SIMS may very well have left me just short of the mark. I expect a high 60's to low 70's if I'm being realistic, maybe even lower… How….. unfortunate….. But I guess if it were easy everyone would be a CPA, eh?
ya rite.
April 14, 2016 at 9:52 pm #763294 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 7’ is closed to new replies.
