AUD Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 31

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 481 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #763640
    Andrew T
    Participant

    I will be retaking AUD 7/16 and my ninja mcq for AUD expires on 7/1. I went through all the ninja mcqs in my first attempt at the exam and I've been working them again while re-reading the Becker book. Should I renew for the 2 weeks or so before the exam or would just using Becker mcq be good enough?

    FAR (2/29/16) - 84
    AUD (5/9/16) - 68; (7/16/16) - 90
    BEC (6/10/16) - 80
    REG (9/8/16)

    #763641
    Theodore
    Participant

    Thanks guys. @Andrew I didn't feel to confident with Becker MCQ. It felt like majority of the time they were restating the right and Wrong answers. I just purchased Ninja MCQ. Hopefully they explanations are better than becker

    FAR: 66, 76!
    REG: 76!
    AUD: 72, 9/7/2016
    BEC: TBA

    Don't Stop When You Are Tired, Stop When You Are Done.

    #763642
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    HELP PLEASE!

    I'm scheduled to take FAR on 8/1. Should I stop studying for FAR and go back to AUD, or just keep at it with FAR and do AUD right after?!?

    #763643
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm about one week into studying for FAR

    #763644
    PACPA2016
    Participant

    Just found out I failed Audit with a 71…. any advice as to how long to spend studying before I retake it again? Thinking about rescheduling for July 2 but can't decide if that's too soon or not

    #763645
    Theodore
    Participant

    @KING I would stick to AUD since it's still fresh (per the advice that was given to me on here)


    @PACPA2016
    when I failed FAR I took the same amount of time to study to retake it. some people take a lot less, depending on how you learn and how quickly you learn. I know I am going go take at least a month.

    FAR: 66, 76!
    REG: 76!
    AUD: 72, 9/7/2016
    BEC: TBA

    Don't Stop When You Are Tired, Stop When You Are Done.

    #763646
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @king,

    Stick with Audit since you are only one week into FAR.

    #763647
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks @Rosy and @bwts!! I just rescheduled FAR for September

    #763648
    cdn
    Participant

    I am also not sure what should I do. Since I failed 3 times AUD, I went for BEC but also failed. I think I will go back to AUD and study again. Mine brain got some break when studying for BEC so I think should be fine now? What are your thoughts?

    AUD 57, 65, 73
    BEC 55
    REG 81
    FAR TBD

    #763649
    Blue.auditor
    Participant

    Hi,

    I am spending a lot of time doing MCQs & Simulations regarding ratios.
    Any tips on how to solve them faster?
    Does the actual exam have many of those?

    FAR 90 - 11/16/2015
    BEC 81 - 2/14/2016
    REG 87 - 5/23/2016
    AUD - 8/8/2016

    #763650
    PACPA2016
    Participant

    Has anyone retaken audit with a score of around a 71? What was the general timeline you used before you retook your exam?

    #763651
    Theodore
    Participant

    I just purchased Ninja MCQ and I love them so far! great explanations!!

    @blue.auditor study, study study ratios and adjusting entries


    @PACPA2016
    Im taking a month and a half to re-study

    FAR: 66, 76!
    REG: 76!
    AUD: 72, 9/7/2016
    BEC: TBA

    Don't Stop When You Are Tired, Stop When You Are Done.

    #763652
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Need a little help with this SIM response.. You are supposed to select the audit procedure to go with the corresponding.

    The auditor obtained the company's aging of accounts receivable and independently created the aging of certain accounts. (answer is reperformance)

    I chose recalculation as the type of audit procedure but was wrong. Why?

    #763653
    marqzho
    Participant

    KING

    it is two different things.

    Recalculation is like this: you see this in the aging
    1+2+3+4+5 = 17
    you do a recalculation
    1+2+3+4+5 = 18 <- so you know there is an error

    Reperformance is like this, you see this in the aging
    1+2+3+4+5 = 18
    you then look at some other data, maybe invoices or AR ledger, to ” independently created the aging of certain accounts”
    end up you have 1+2+3+3+3 = 12 <- then you know there is an error

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763654
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks @marqzho

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 481 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 31’ is closed to new replies.