- This topic has 1,631 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 6 months ago by
pracap.
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 20, 2015 at 10:18 pm #669745
ahugemistakeParticipantTre I remember this question and I remember Ninja's explanation being that since the client is the one sending the confirmations they should be the one to follow up with them. This is what the positive confirm letter says when sent to the client:
Gentlemen:
Our auditors, [name and address], are conducting an audit of our financial statements. Please examine the accompanying statement and either confirm its correctness or report any differences to our auditors.
Your prompt attention to this request will be appreciated. An envelope is enclosed for your reply.
Very truly yours,
The explanation seemed reasonable to me for a positive confirm.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79May 20, 2015 at 11:56 pm #669746
highlightnumbParticipantC for the positive confirmation question
FAR. Feb 2014 76
REG. Jan 2015 79 half way there!!
BEC. Feb 2015 79 thank you God!!
AUD. Apr 20, 2015 and will be done. Hold that thought 65, 7/14/15 85!
Ok where was I? Oh thats right now I'm Done!!!!!!!!!
Ethics 92!!"You down wit SEC?, yeah you know me!!!"
Cali Candidate
All Becker Materials, Wiley Test Bank, Ninja audio, Ninja MCQ, Ninja Notes
May 21, 2015 at 1:06 am #669747
lavenderskyMemberThe basic content of a report on management's assertion on the effectiveness of a nonissuer's internal control includes all of the following items except:
A statement on the inherent limitations of internal control, referring to the possibility of errors and irregularities, and suggesting that the reader not project the examination results beyond the effective date of the report.
A statement that the examination was made in accordance with AICPA standards and the examination provided a reasonable basis for an opinion.
An opinion paragraph addressing the fairness of the management assertion in all material respects based on stated criteria.
A paragraph restricting use of the report only to management and specified third parties.
The answer is the last one. how come? isn't it restricted used??? According to Becker A5 pg 28? OR am I missing smthg? please help! thanks!
FAR- PASSED
AUD- PASSED
REG- PASSED
BEC-You got to do what you have to do!
May 21, 2015 at 2:24 am #669748
AnonymousInactiveCan someone help me out with the 3rd simulation in the AICPA sample exam on JE. I understand everything for the most part. I just don't understand in the second part why sales and A/R would be 50,000. If the inventory is valued at 45,000 and the profit margin is 10%, wouldn't sales be 49,500? I would REALLY appreciate it if someone could help me out!
May 21, 2015 at 12:28 pm #669749
tman102938ParticipantJust had a dream that a phantom voice was asking me NINJA mcq's….2 days…..
BEC:69,79 PASS
FAR:77 PASS
REG: 7/30
AUD:68,64"If you want something, go get it. Period."
May 21, 2015 at 3:22 pm #669750
TreMemberI still don't agree… Working in an audit office, that isn't how we do things. Every book (Bisk, CPAExcel) has the auditor's being responsible for sending out positive confirmations due to it being a level 1 type of evidence and if a response has not been turned in, the auditor is responsible for reaching out again. The quote I am presenting below is directly from the AICPA.
To ensure the reliability and security of information, an auditor “should maintain control over sending the confirmations and the responses received.”
BEC - 84
REG - 88
FAR - 75
AUD - 71, Nov 2015May 21, 2015 at 3:22 pm #669751
JeanPaul9Participant@egiorgi Profit margin is : PROFIT divided by SALES. I was baffled too while working on that sim then I looked up the ration for profit margin.
In order to find $50,000 do this.
x – 45000 = .10x
x is the SALES (minus) COST = 10% Profit on the SALES.
Hope it helps.
May 21, 2015 at 3:37 pm #669752
lab122MemberCan someone help me with this?
This will be my 4th time taking audit next week. There are two sims that I had on both of the last two audit exams I took. I can't remember the exact details, but I know the general questions. If I have been missing these, I really want to change that, especially if I get them for a 3rd time (unlikely).
First: How is net income affected by the following independent situations?
1.) Accrued expense needs to be adjusted down.
2.) Rent expense need to be adjusted up.
3.) Accrued payroll needs to be adjusted up.
Basically is net income affected by these and how?
Second: Control Risk and Detection Risk – How are they affected?
Instead of stating situations, my question here is if detection risk increases, then control risk needs to decrease correct? On the exam, there are multiple independent situations and then I had to decide if they changed and how.
Thanks!
REG: 55,60,76 Passed
BEC: 71,73,77 Passed
AUD: 59,67,72,72, 90!!! Passed
FAR: 45,52,74,70,79 Passed!!!I'm done!!!!
May 21, 2015 at 3:58 pm #669753
JeanPaul9ParticipantFirst: How is net income affected by the following independent situations?
1.) Accrued expense needs to be adjusted down.
If expenses are ADJUSTED DOWN (reducing the over expensed account) then NI increases.
For instance, Rev: $1000 & Exp (before ADJ): $600 then NI (before ADJ) = $400
If Expenses adjusted down: $1000 – $500 = NI (after ADJ) $500
> NI went up by $100.2.) Rent expense need to be adjusted up.
Rev: $1000 & Exp (before ADJ): $600 then NI (before ADJ) = $400
If Expenses adjusted up: $1000 – $700 = NI (after ADJ) $300
> NI went down by $100.3.) Accrued payroll needs to be adjusted up.
Rev: $1000 & Exp (before ADJ): $600 then NI (before ADJ) = $400
If Expenses adjusted up: $1000 – $700 = NI (after ADJ) $300
> NI went down by $100.Basically is net income affected by these and how?
Second: Control Risk and Detection Risk – How are they affected?
The auditor cannot change the control risk, only he/she can assess it and decide on the extent of the substantive tests to lower the DETECTION RISK. The auditor, however cannot take a stance on the CONTROL RISK after considering the extent of substantive tests (DR). Its only a oneway street —-> Assess CR first then decide on the DR (substantive tests) not vice versa.
May 21, 2015 at 4:36 pm #669754
jeffKeymasterMay 21, 2015 at 8:05 pm #669755
cdnParticipantMay 21, 2015 at 8:20 pm #669756
lab122Member@JeanPaul9 Thank you! That all makes sense!
REG: 55,60,76 Passed
BEC: 71,73,77 Passed
AUD: 59,67,72,72, 90!!! Passed
FAR: 45,52,74,70,79 Passed!!!I'm done!!!!
May 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm #669757
ahugemistakeParticipantTre I agree with you, I got the question wrong when I was doing it too, but after I read that letter it made sense to me. I just hope it's not on the exam.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79May 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm #669758
ahugemistakeParticipantTre I agree with you, I got the question wrong when I was doing it too, but after I read that letter it made sense to me. I just hope it's not on the exam.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79May 22, 2015 at 6:42 am #669759
ahugemistakeParticipantJust did a practice exam on ninja, got 76, 86 and 80 on the questions, and skipped 2 sims and ended up with a 67 over all, which is not bad. Plan on re-writing the ninja notes this weekend and reviewing more questions, and sections I'm not comfortable with yet.
FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 93’ is closed to new replies.
