AUD Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 69

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #192520
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2015 CPA Exam Study Group for AUD.

    World Premier: “Unmodified” (Audit Reports Rap Video) 🙂

    Posted by Another71 on Thursday, November 13, 2014

    Free NINJA: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,631 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #669378
    SomedayCPA2015
    Participant

    @ahugemistake I had the WTB to supplement Becker before they both expired. I found it to be too easy and bit deceptive. Ninja are harder than WTB and Becker IMO, but I find them to be the best. You can't beat the cost, and the explanations are far superior to others. My Becker expired in December and I am now using Ninja exclusively for AUD. I'm finding AUD more difficult to study for than REG and BEC since I am bored to tears, but hopefully my method does not fail me now. Good luck!

    REG - Passed
    BEC - Passed
    AUD - Passed
    FAR - Passed!!!! I have my life back.

    #669379
    knicks92
    Member

    for those of you using Becker for the difference estimation method in sampling, do you add and subtract the projected error to the total book value amount and that range is your precision interval. I am referring to A5-18 because i noticed they only subtracted the projected error from the total book value amount to get a point estimate value but nothing was added.

    Tough times don't last. Tough people do.

    B: 88
    A: 77
    R: 89
    F:

    #669380
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Is it me or Audit just MOSTLY an exercise in memorization? A lot of it makes no sense and it's the same words over and over (materiality, risk, assertion, substantive) just in different order. I feel like I just created an MCQ question just by listing audit buzz words….

    Anyways, hope this isn't a dumb Q… how are people studying for management assertions (existence, rights obligations) with respect to the substantive procedure (example: review collection subsequent to year end)? How do you know what assertion goes with what substantive procedure?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #669381
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    Guys, my exam is next week and I'm scoring 70% across the board. Any suggestions on improvement? What percentage should I be at to guarantee best changes of passing?

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669382
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    @Claudia – I'm struggling with that.

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669383
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    @knicks – I can't get statistical concepts to my head. I'd like some pointers in how you've been able to grasp some of the concepts.

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669384
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    @Mr.SD – I wish you good luck! I hope for the best for you.

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669385
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone please explain this

    An auditor is conducting an attribute sampling application to test the effectiveness of a particular control. The following rates have been determined:

    Sample deviation rate: 5%

    Tolerable deviation rate: 6%

    Allowance for sampling risk: 2%

    a) Since the tolerable deviation rate exceeds the sample deviation rate, the auditor may rely on the control.

    b) Since the sample deviation rate exceeds the tolerable deviation rate less the allowance for sampling risk, the auditor may rely on the control.

    c) Since the tolerable deviation rate plus the allowance for sampling risk exceeds the sample deviation rate, the auditor may not rely on the control.

    d) Since the tolerable deviation rate less the allowance for sampling risk is less than the sample deviation rate, the auditor may not rely on the control.

    UDR > TDR, so not reliable. What is up with these ridiculously incorrect options? Why would you add/subtract UDR components to TDR? Becker final exam is just meant to trick people a bunch of scenarios that will never be even likely to occur. Hate this.

    EDIT:

    Nevermind, just had to write down the equation down on paper, Still overly wordy, tricky and annoying though.

    #669386
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    @Ekinsbs – Can you explain that? I'm weak with statistical. Any tips on getting it down?

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669387
    okcpa2015
    Participant

    NINJA MCQ Heat Check… 31 days out from AUD

    *Average Trending: 84%

    *Average: 78%

    *56% of Questions Answered Correctly

    *512 questions not seen

    How is everyone else doing? Big study weekend coming up!

    FAR - 91
    REG - 88
    AUD - 98
    BEC - 88

    #669388
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    82% trending

    65% average

    0 questions not seen

    383 questions wrong

    I have 21 more days to get prepared. I have a lot more studying to do.

    #669389
    plotikkk85
    Member

    Hi ALL! Not sure why correct answer is C instead of D.

    Which of the following is a substantive test that an auditor most likely would perform to verify the existence and valuation of recorded accounts payable?

    A Investigating the open purchase file to ascertain that prenumbered purchase orders are used and accounted for.

    B Receiving the client's mail, unopened, for a reasonable period of time after the year end to search for unrecorded vendor's invoices.

    C Comparing selected entries in the accounts payable subsidiary ledger to purchase orders and receiving reports.

    D Confirming accounts payable balances with known suppliers who have zero balances.

    Here is the explanation: In order to verify the existence and valuation of the accounts payable account, the auditor should go to the source documents. These would include purchase orders and receiving reports.

    I was thinking that confirmation is the best way to verify existence of A/P.

    #669390
    Martin
    Participant

    I would think the answer is D as per Roger.cpa review book.

    Through God all things can happen!

    “You never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein
    When I was young, I used to admire intelligent people;as I grow older, I admire kind people.
    “Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.”

    FAR= 72-84
    Audit= 73-82
    BEC= 74-75
    Reg=77

    #669391
    CPA2B_NJ
    Member

    Last weekend to study, exam is this Wednesday, and I'm still scoring 70%……freaking out.

    FAR - 50, 78
    BEC - 67, 72, 75
    AUD - 72, 80
    REG - 70, 85

    To God be the glory! Forever, amen!

    NJ License

    #669392
    trish_1234
    Member

    Martin Lady you guys sat the exam???

    AUD 69, 92 7/15 Gleim and Ninja test bank
    FAR sometime in 10/15 Gleim
    BEC not taken
    REG not taken

Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,631 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q2 2015 - Page 69’ is closed to new replies.